Witzel Dakota D, Chandler Kelly D, Stawski Robert S
Center for Healthy Aging, Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA.
School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
J Soc Pers Relat. 2023 Mar;40(3):1044-1066. doi: 10.1177/02654075221125431. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
The goal of this study was to examine whether family involvement and gender moderated daily changes in affect associated with interpersonal stressors. Adults ( = 2022; = 56.25, Median = 56, = 12.20, Range = 33-84) from the second wave of the National Study of Daily Experiences participated in eight consecutive daily diaries. Each day they reported whether a daily interpersonal stressor occurred, whether family was involved, and their positive and negative affect. Results from multilevel models indicated that family involvement did not significantly moderate daily interpersonal stressor-affect associations; however, gender was a significant moderator in some instances. Women showed greater increases in negative affective reactivity to arguments and avoided arguments compared to men. Further, compared to men, women reported larger decreases in positive affective reactivity, but only for avoided arguments. Neither family involvement, gender, nor the interaction between family involvement and gender predicted affective residue. Gender differences in daily interpersonal stressors and affective reactivity may be attributable to overarching gender norms and roles that are still salient in the U.S. Our results suggest that daily interpersonal stressors may be detrimental to affective well-being, regardless of family involvement. Future work should explore associations between daily interpersonal stressors and family involvement by specific relationship roles, such as mother or spouse, for a more comprehensive understanding of what stressor characteristics impact daily affective well-being.
本研究的目的是检验家庭参与和性别是否会调节与人际压力源相关的情绪每日变化。来自“全国日常经历研究”第二轮的成年人((n = 2022);(M = 56.25),中位数 = 56,(SD = 12.20),范围 = 33 - 84)连续八天参与每日日记记录。他们每天报告是否发生了日常人际压力源、家庭是否参与以及他们的积极和消极情绪。多层次模型的结果表明,家庭参与并没有显著调节日常人际压力源与情绪的关联;然而,在某些情况下,性别是一个显著的调节因素。与男性相比,女性在对争吵的负面情绪反应上增加得更多,并且会避免争吵。此外,与男性相比,女性报告在积极情绪反应上的下降幅度更大,但仅限于避免的争吵。家庭参与、性别以及家庭参与和性别的交互作用均未预测情绪残留。日常人际压力源和情绪反应中的性别差异可能归因于在美国仍然显著的总体性别规范和角色。我们的结果表明,无论家庭是否参与,日常人际压力源可能对情绪幸福感有害。未来的研究应该探索日常人际压力源与特定关系角色(如母亲或配偶)的家庭参与之间的关联,以便更全面地了解哪些压力源特征会影响日常情绪幸福感。