Rolls Robert J, Deane David C, Johnson Sarah E, Heino Jani, Anderson Marti J, Ellingsen Kari E
School of Environmental and Rural Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia.
School of Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environment, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3086, Australia.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Aug;98(4):1388-1423. doi: 10.1111/brv.12958. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
Biotic homogenisation is defined as decreasing dissimilarity among ecological assemblages sampled within a given spatial area over time. Biotic differentiation, in turn, is defined as increasing dissimilarity over time. Overall, changes in the spatial dissimilarities among assemblages (termed 'beta diversity') is an increasingly recognised feature of broader biodiversity change in the Anthropocene. Empirical evidence of biotic homogenisation and biotic differentiation remains scattered across different ecosystems. Most meta-analyses quantify the prevalence and direction of change in beta diversity, rather than attempting to identify underlying ecological drivers of such changes. By conceptualising the mechanisms that contribute to decreasing or increasing dissimilarity in the composition of ecological assemblages across space, environmental managers and conservation practitioners can make informed decisions about what interventions may be required to sustain biodiversity and can predict potential biodiversity outcomes of future disturbances. We systematically reviewed and synthesised published empirical evidence for ecological drivers of biotic homogenisation and differentiation across terrestrial, marine, and freshwater realms to derive conceptual models that explain changes in spatial beta diversity. We pursued five key themes in our review: (i) temporal environmental change; (ii) disturbance regime; (iii) connectivity alteration and species redistribution; (iv) habitat change; and (v) biotic and trophic interactions. Our first conceptual model highlights how biotic homogenisation and differentiation can occur as a function of changes in local (alpha) diversity or regional (gamma) diversity, independently of species invasions and losses due to changes in species occurrence among assemblages. Second, the direction and magnitude of change in beta diversity depends on the interaction between spatial variation (patchiness) and temporal variation (synchronicity) of disturbance events. Third, in the context of connectivity and species redistribution, divergent beta diversity outcomes occur as different species have different dispersal characteristics, and the magnitude of beta diversity change associated with species invasions also depends strongly on alpha and gamma diversity prior to species invasion. Fourth, beta diversity is positively linked with spatial environmental variability, such that biotic homogenisation and differentiation occur when environmental heterogeneity decreases or increases, respectively. Fifth, species interactions can influence beta diversity via habitat modification, disease, consumption (trophic dynamics), competition, and by altering ecosystem productivity. Our synthesis highlights the multitude of mechanisms that cause assemblages to be more or less spatially similar in composition (taxonomically, functionally, phylogenetically) through time. We consider that future studies should aim to enhance our collective understanding of ecological systems by clarifying the underlying mechanisms driving homogenisation or differentiation, rather than focusing only on reporting the prevalence and direction of change in beta diversity, per se.
生物同质化被定义为随着时间推移,给定空间区域内采样的生态群落之间的差异减小。相反,生物分化被定义为随着时间推移差异增加。总体而言,群落之间空间差异(称为“β多样性”)的变化是人类世更广泛生物多样性变化中一个日益被认识到的特征。生物同质化和生物分化的实证证据仍然分散在不同的生态系统中。大多数荟萃分析量化了β多样性变化的发生率和方向,而不是试图确定这种变化的潜在生态驱动因素。通过概念化导致生态群落组成在空间上差异减小或增加的机制,环境管理者和保护从业者可以做出明智的决策,即可能需要采取哪些干预措施来维持生物多样性,并可以预测未来干扰可能产生的生物多样性结果。我们系统地回顾和综合了已发表的关于陆地、海洋和淡水领域生物同质化和分化的生态驱动因素的实证证据,以得出解释空间β多样性变化的概念模型。我们在综述中探讨了五个关键主题:(i)时间环境变化;(ii)干扰 regime;(iii)连通性改变和物种重新分布;(iv)栖息地变化;以及(v)生物和营养相互作用。我们的第一个概念模型强调了生物同质化和分化如何作为局部(α)多样性或区域(γ)多样性变化的函数而发生,独立于由于群落间物种出现变化导致的物种入侵和丧失。其次,β多样性变化的方向和幅度取决于干扰事件的空间变化(斑块性)和时间变化(同步性)之间的相互作用。第三,在连通性和物种重新分布的背景下,由于不同物种具有不同的扩散特征,会出现不同的β多样性结果,并且与物种入侵相关的β多样性变化幅度也强烈取决于物种入侵之前的α和γ多样性。第四,β多样性与空间环境变异性呈正相关,因此当环境异质性分别降低或增加时,会发生生物同质化和分化。第五,物种相互作用可以通过栖息地改变、疾病、消费(营养动态)、竞争以及改变生态系统生产力来影响β多样性。我们的综合分析强调了多种机制,这些机制导致群落在组成(分类学、功能、系统发育)上随着时间推移在空间上或多或少地相似。我们认为,未来的研究应该旨在通过阐明驱动同质化或分化的潜在机制来增强我们对生态系统的集体理解,而不是仅仅关注报告β多样性变化的发生率和方向本身。