Suppr超能文献

KeyLoop 牵开器在非气腹腹腔镜手术中的应用:在猪模型中评估其安全性和可行性。

KeyLoop retractor for global gasless laparoscopy: evaluation of safety and feasibility in a porcine model.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Association for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, MH, India.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):5943-5955. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10054-5. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many surgeons in low- and middle-income countries have described performing surgery using gasless (lift) laparoscopy due to inaccessibility of carbon dioxide and reliable electricity, but the safety and feasibility of the technique has not been well documented. We describe preclinical testing of the in vivo safety and utility of KeyLoop, a laparoscopic retractor system to enable gasless laparoscopy.

METHODS

Experienced laparoscopic surgeons completed a series of four laparoscopic tasks in a porcine model: laparoscopic exposure, small bowel resection, intracorporeal suturing with knot tying, and cholecystectomy. For each participating surgeon, the four tasks were completed in a practice animal using KeyLoop. Surgeons then completed these tasks using standard-of-care (SOC) gas laparoscopy and KeyLoop in block randomized order to minimize learning curve effect. Vital signs, task completion time, blood loss and surgical complications were compared between SOC and KeyLoop using paired nonparametric tests. Surgeons completed a survey on use of KeyLoop compared to gas laparoscopy. Abdominal wall tissue was evaluated for injury by a blinded pathologist.

RESULTS

Five surgeons performed 60 tasks in 15 pigs. There were no significant differences in times to complete the tasks between KeyLoop and SOC. For all tasks, there was a learning curve with task completion times related to learning the porcine model. There were no significant differences in blood loss, vital signs or surgical complications between KeyLoop and SOC. Eleven surgeons from the United States and Singapore felt that KeyLoop could be used to safely perform several common surgical procedures. No abdominal wall tissue injury was observed for either KeyLoop or SOC.

CONCLUSIONS

Procedure times, blood loss, abdominal wall tissue injury and surgical complications were similar between KeyLoop and SOC gas laparoscopy for basic surgical procedures. This data supports KeyLoop as a useful tool to increase access to laparoscopy in low- and middle-income countries.

摘要

背景

许多中低收入国家的外科医生由于无法获得二氧化碳和可靠的电力,已经描述了使用无气(提升)腹腔镜进行手术,但该技术的安全性和可行性尚未得到很好的记录。我们描述了 KeyLoop 的临床前安全性和实用性测试,KeyLoop 是一种腹腔镜牵开器系统,可实现无气腹腔镜手术。

方法

经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生在猪模型中完成了一系列四项腹腔镜任务:腹腔镜暴露、小肠切除术、体腔内缝合打结和胆囊切除术。对于每位参与的外科医生,这四项任务都是在使用 KeyLoop 的练习动物身上完成的。然后,外科医生使用标准护理(SOC)气体腹腔镜和 KeyLoop 以块随机顺序完成这些任务,以最小化学习曲线效应。使用配对非参数检验比较 SOC 和 KeyLoop 之间的生命体征、任务完成时间、失血量和手术并发症。外科医生完成了一项关于使用 KeyLoop 与气体腹腔镜相比的调查。一位盲法病理学家评估了腹壁组织的损伤情况。

结果

五名外科医生在 15 头猪身上完成了 60 项任务。使用 KeyLoop 和 SOC 完成任务的时间没有显著差异。对于所有任务,都存在与学习猪模型相关的任务完成时间学习曲线。KeyLoop 和 SOC 之间在失血量、生命体征或手术并发症方面没有显著差异。来自美国和新加坡的 11 名外科医生认为 KeyLoop 可安全用于执行几种常见的手术程序。无论是 KeyLoop 还是 SOC,都没有观察到腹壁组织损伤。

结论

在基本手术程序中,KeyLoop 和 SOC 气体腹腔镜的手术时间、失血量、腹壁组织损伤和手术并发症相似。这些数据支持 KeyLoop 作为增加中低收入国家腹腔镜手术机会的有用工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11dd/10338623/46d4a15c4164/464_2023_10054_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验