Suppr超能文献

关节镜下肩胛胸壁囊切除术联合和不联合上内侧角肩胛成形术:患者报告结局的比较。

Arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy with and without superomedial angle scapuloplasty: a comparison of patient-reported outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Sep;32(9):1945-1952. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.020. Epub 2023 Apr 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Operative treatment of scapulothoracic bursitis most commonly comprises arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy with or without partial superomedial angle scapuloplasty. There is currently no consensus regarding whether or when scapuloplasty should be performed. Prior studies are limited to small case series, and optimal surgical indications are not yet established. The purposes of this study were (1) to retrospectively review patient-reported outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of scapulothoracic bursitis and (2) to compare outcomes between scapulothoracic bursectomy alone and bursectomy with scapuloplasty. We hypothesized that bursectomy with scapuloplasty would provide superior pain relief and functional improvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All cases of scapulothoracic débridement with or without scapuloplasty completed at a single academic center from 2007 through August 2020 were reviewed. Patient demographic characteristics, symptomatology data, physical examination findings, and corticosteroid injection response data were collected from the electronic medical record. Visual analog scale pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores were collected. Comparisons between the group undergoing bursectomy alone and the group undergoing bursectomy with scapuloplasty were made using the Student t test for continuous variables and the Fisher exact test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

Thirty patients underwent scapulothoracic bursectomy alone, and 38 patients underwent bursectomy with scapuloplasty. Final follow-up data were available for 56 of 68 cases (82%). Final postoperative visual analog scale pain scores (3.4 ± 2.2 and 2.8 ± 2.2, respectively; P = .351), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (75.8 ± 17.7 and 76.5 ± 22.5, respectively; P = .895), and Simple Shoulder Test scores (8.8 ± 2.3 and 9.5 ± 2.8, respectively; P = .340) were similar between the bursectomy-alone and bursectomy-with-scapuloplasty groups.

CONCLUSION

Both arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy alone and bursectomy with scapuloplasty are effective treatments for scapulothoracic bursitis. Operative time is shorter without scapuloplasty. In this retrospective series, these procedures showed similar outcomes regarding shoulder function, pain, surgical complications, and rates of subsequent shoulder surgery. Further studies with a focus on 3-dimensional scapular morphology may help optimize patient selection for each of these procedures.

摘要

背景

治疗肩胛胸壁滑囊炎的手术治疗方法通常包括关节镜下肩胛胸壁滑囊切除术,或联合或不联合肩胛上内角部分切除术。目前对于是否应进行肩胛成形术还没有共识。先前的研究仅限于小病例系列,且尚未确定最佳的手术适应证。本研究的目的为:(1)回顾性分析关节镜治疗肩胛胸壁滑囊炎的患者报告结局;(2)比较单纯肩胛胸壁滑囊切除术与肩胛胸壁滑囊切除术联合肩胛成形术的结果。我们假设肩胛成形术联合肩胛胸壁滑囊切除术将提供更好的疼痛缓解和功能改善。

材料和方法

对 2007 年至 2020 年 8 月期间在一家学术中心完成的所有肩胛胸壁清创术(联合或不联合肩胛成形术)的病例进行回顾性分析。从电子病历中收集患者的人口统计学特征、症状数据、体格检查结果和皮质类固醇注射反应数据。收集视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分、美国肩肘外科医生协会评分(ASES)、简单肩部测试(SST)和单评估数字评估(SANE)评分。采用学生 t 检验比较单纯肩胛胸壁滑囊切除术组和肩胛胸壁滑囊切除术联合肩胛成形术组的连续变量,采用 Fisher 确切概率法比较分类变量。

结果

30 例患者接受单纯肩胛胸壁滑囊切除术,38 例患者接受肩胛胸壁滑囊切除术联合肩胛成形术。68 例患者中有 56 例(82%)获得最终随访数据。最终术后 VAS 疼痛评分(分别为 3.4±2.2 和 2.8±2.2;P=0.351)、ASES 评分(分别为 75.8±17.7 和 76.5±22.5;P=0.895)和 SST 评分(分别为 8.8±2.3 和 9.5±2.8;P=0.340)在单纯肩胛胸壁滑囊切除术组和肩胛胸壁滑囊切除术联合肩胛成形术组之间相似。

结论

关节镜下单纯肩胛胸壁滑囊切除术和肩胛胸壁滑囊切除术联合肩胛成形术均为肩胛胸壁滑囊炎的有效治疗方法。不进行肩胛成形术可缩短手术时间。在本回顾性系列研究中,这两种手术在肩部功能、疼痛、手术并发症和后续肩部手术的发生率方面具有相似的结果。进一步的研究侧重于三维肩胛骨形态,可能有助于为这两种手术的每一种手术选择提供更好的患者选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验