Physical Therapy Program, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
J Man Manip Ther. 2023 Dec;31(6):393-407. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2202895. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
Neck pain is among the most prevalent and costly musculoskeletal disorders. Manual therapy and exercise are two standard treatment approaches to manage neck pain. In addition, clinical practice guidelines recommend a multi-modal approach, including both manual therapy and exercise for the treatment of neck pain; however, the specific effects of these combined interventions have not recently been reported in the literature.
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of manual therapy combined with exercise on pain, disability, and quality of life in individuals with nonspecific neck pain.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Electronic database searches were completed in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, Ovid, and SportDiscus, with publication dates of January 2000 to December 2022. The risk of bias in the included articles was completed using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2). Raw data were pooled using standardized mean differences and mean differences for pain, disability, and quality of life outcomes, and forest plots were computed in the meta-analysis.
Twenty-two studies were included in the final review. With moderate certainty of evidence, three studies demonstrated no significant difference between manual therapy plus exercise and manual therapy alone in pain (SMD of -0.25 (95% CI: -0.52, 0.02)) or disability (-0.37 (95% CI: -0.92, 0.18)). With a low certainty of evidence, 16 studies demonstrated that manual therapy plus exercise is significantly better than exercise alone for reducing pain (-0.95 (95%CI: -1.38, -0.51)). Similarly, with low certainty of evidence, 13 studies demonstrated that manual therapy plus exercise is significantly better than exercise alone for reducing disability (-0.59 (95% CI: -0.90, -0.28)). Four studies demonstrated that manual therapy plus exercise is significantly better than a control intervention for reducing pain (moderate certainty) (-2.15 (95%CI: -3.58, -0.73)) and disability (low certainty) (-2.39 (95% CI: -3.80, -0.98)). With a high certainty of evidence, four studies demonstrated no significant difference between manual therapy plus exercise and exercise alone in quality of life (SMD of -0.02 (95% CI: -0.21, 0.18)).
Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis, a multi-modal treatment approach including exercise and manual therapy appears to provide similar effects as manual therapy alone, but is more effective than exercise alone or other interventions (control, placebo, 'conventional physical therapy', etc.) for the treatment of nonspecific neck pain and related disability. Some caution needs to be taken when interpreting these results given the general low to moderate certainty of the quality of the evidence.
颈部疼痛是最常见和代价最高的肌肉骨骼疾病之一。手法治疗和运动是管理颈部疼痛的两种标准治疗方法。此外,临床实践指南建议采用多模式方法,包括手法治疗和运动治疗颈部疼痛;然而,这些联合干预措施的具体效果最近并未在文献中报道。
进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定手法治疗联合运动治疗非特异性颈部疼痛患者疼痛、残疾和生活质量的效果。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
电子数据库检索 PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane、EMBASE、Ovid 和 SportDiscus,检索日期为 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月。使用修订后的 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)评估纳入文章的偏倚风险。使用标准化均数差和疼痛、残疾和生活质量结局的均数差对原始数据进行汇总,并在荟萃分析中计算森林图。
最终综述纳入了 22 项研究。有三项研究的证据确定性为中等,结果表明手法治疗加运动与单纯手法治疗在疼痛(SMD 为-0.25(95%CI:-0.52,0.02))或残疾(-0.37(95%CI:-0.92,0.18))方面无显著差异。有 16 项研究的证据确定性为低,结果表明手法治疗加运动比单纯运动治疗更能显著减轻疼痛(-0.95(95%CI:-1.38,-0.51))。同样,有 13 项研究的证据确定性为低,结果表明手法治疗加运动比单纯运动治疗更能显著减轻残疾(-0.59(95%CI:-0.90,-0.28))。四项研究表明,手法治疗加运动比对照组干预更能显著减轻疼痛(中等确定性)(-2.15(95%CI:-3.58,-0.73))和残疾(低确定性)(-2.39(95%CI:-3.80,-0.98))。四项研究的证据确定性为高,结果表明手法治疗加运动与单纯运动治疗在生活质量方面无显著差异(SMD 为-0.02(95%CI:-0.21,0.18))。
基于这项系统评价和荟萃分析,包括运动和手法治疗的多模式治疗方法似乎与单纯手法治疗效果相似,但比单纯运动治疗或其他干预措施(对照、安慰剂、“常规物理治疗”等)更有效治疗非特异性颈部疼痛及其相关残疾。鉴于证据质量普遍较低或中等,在解释这些结果时需要谨慎。