Desvages Anne, Hives Florent, Deprez Xavier, Pierache Adeline, Béhal Hélène, Flipo René-Marc, Paccou Julien
Department of Rheumatology, Lille University Hospital, University of Lille, CHU Lille, 59000 Lille, France.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Lille University Hospital, University of Lille, CHU Lille, 59000 Lille, France.
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 13;12(8):2844. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082844.
We aimed to evaluate the utility of FDG-PET/CT in diagnosing polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and associated large-vessel vasculitis (LVV).
We analyzed FDG-PET/CT completed between 2015 and 2019 on patients diagnosed with PMR. For comparisons, patients with PMR were matched 1:1 to controls based on age and gender. FDG-PET/CT had been completed on the controls over the same period. The FDG uptake was scored visually for 17 articular or periarticular sites and 13 vascular sites using a semi-quantitative scoring system (score of 0-3).
Eighty-one patients with PMR and eighty-one controls were included (mean age 70.7 (9.8) years; 44.4% women). Significant differences between the PMR and control groups were found at all articular and periarticular sites for the following: (i) the FDG uptake score ( < 0.001 for all locations); (ii) the number of patients per site with significant FDG uptake (score ≥ 2); (iii) the global FDG articular uptake scores (31 [IQR, 21 to 37] versus 6 [IQR, 3 to 10], < 0.001); and (iv) the number of sites with significant FDG uptake (score ≥ 2) (scores of 0-17) (11 [IQR, 7 to 13] versus 1 [IQR, 0 to 2], < 0.001). No significant differences in the global FDG vascular uptake scores were found between the patients who were considered isolated PMR and the control groups.
The FDG uptake score and the number of sites with significant FDG uptake could be pertinent criteria for the diagnosis of PMR. Unlike others, we did not confirm the presence of vascular involvement in patients with isolated PMR.
我们旨在评估氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(FDG-PET/CT)在诊断风湿性多肌痛(PMR)及相关大血管血管炎(LVV)中的效用。
我们分析了2015年至2019年间对诊断为PMR的患者进行的FDG-PET/CT检查。为作比较,根据年龄和性别将PMR患者与对照组按1:1进行匹配。同期对对照组进行了FDG-PET/CT检查。使用半定量评分系统(0-3分)对17个关节或关节周围部位以及13个血管部位的FDG摄取进行视觉评分。
纳入了81例PMR患者和81例对照组(平均年龄70.7(9.8)岁;44.4%为女性)。在所有关节和关节周围部位,PMR组和对照组之间在以下方面存在显著差异:(i)FDG摄取评分(所有部位均<0.001);(ii)每个部位FDG摄取显著增加(评分≥2)的患者数量;(iii)整体FDG关节摄取评分(31[四分位间距,21至37]对6[四分位间距,3至10],<0.001);以及(iv)FDG摄取显著增加(评分≥2)的部位数量(0-17分)(11[四分位间距,7至13]对1[四分位间距,0至2],<0.001)。在单纯PMR患者和对照组之间,整体FDG血管摄取评分未发现显著差异。
FDG摄取评分以及FDG摄取显著增加的部位数量可能是诊断PMR的相关标准。与其他研究不同,我们未证实在单纯PMR患者中存在血管受累情况。