Born Sebastian, Matthäus-Krämer Claudia, Bichmann Anna, Boltz Hannah-Sophia, Esch Marlene, Heydt Luisa, Sell Stefan, Streich Kathleen, Scherag André, Reinhart Konrad, Hartog Christiane S, Fleischmann-Struzek Carolin
Institute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 11;10:1137027. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1137027. eCollection 2023.
Sepsis survivors often suffer from new morbidities. Current rehabilitation therapies are not tailored to their specific needs. The perspective of sepsis survivors and their caregivers on rehabilitation and aftercare is insufficiently understood. We aimed to assess how sepsis survivors in Germany rated the suitability, extent and satisfaction with rehabilitation therapies that they underwent in the year following the acute sepsis episode.
Prospective mixed-methods, multicenter study among a cohort of adult ICU-treated sepsis survivors and their caregivers. Interviews were conducted 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge by telephone and comprised closed as well as open-ended questions. Primary outcomes were the utilization and patient satisfaction with inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation and post-sepsis aftercare in general. Open-ended questions were analyzed according to the principles of content analysis.
Foun hundred interviews were performed with 287 patients and/or relatives. At 6 months after sepsis, 85.0% of survivors had applied for and 70.0% had undergone rehabilitation. Among these, 97% received physical therapy, but only a minority reported therapies for specific ailments including pain, weaning from mechanical ventilation, cognitive deficits of fatigue. Survivors were moderately satisfied with the suitability, extent, and overall results of received therapies and perceived deficits in the timeliness, accessibility, and specificity of therapies as well as deficits in the structural support frameworks and patient education.
From the perspective of survivors who undergo rehabilitation, therapies should already begin in hospital, be more appropriate for their specific ailments and include better patient and caregiver education. The general aftercare and structural support framework should be improved.
脓毒症幸存者常常患有新的疾病。当前的康复治疗并未针对他们的特定需求进行定制。对于脓毒症幸存者及其照顾者在康复和后续护理方面的观点,我们了解得并不充分。我们旨在评估德国的脓毒症幸存者如何评价他们在急性脓毒症发作后的一年内所接受的康复治疗的适用性、程度和满意度。
对一组接受成人重症监护病房治疗的脓毒症幸存者及其照顾者进行前瞻性混合方法多中心研究。在重症监护病房出院后6个月和12个月通过电话进行访谈,包括封闭式和开放式问题。主要结局是住院和门诊康复以及一般脓毒症后护理的利用率和患者满意度。根据内容分析原则对开放式问题进行分析。
对287名患者和/或亲属进行了400次访谈。在脓毒症发生6个月后,85.0%的幸存者申请了康复治疗,70.0%接受了康复治疗。其中,97%接受了物理治疗,但只有少数人报告接受了针对特定疾病的治疗,包括疼痛、机械通气脱机、认知缺陷或疲劳。幸存者对所接受治疗的适用性、程度和总体结果中度满意,并认为治疗在及时性、可及性和针对性方面存在不足,以及在结构支持框架和患者教育方面存在不足。
从接受康复治疗的幸存者的角度来看,治疗应在医院就开始,更适合他们的特定疾病,并包括更好的患者和照顾者教育。一般的后续护理和结构支持框架应予以改善。