Ogier Emily M, Smith David C, Breen Sian, Gardner Caleb, Gaughan Daniel J, Gorfine Harry K, Hobday Alistair J, Moltschaniwskyj Natalie, Murphy Ryan, Saunders Thor, Steer Mike, Woodhams James
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Centre for Marine Socioecology, Hobart, TAS Australia.
Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2023;33(2):513-534. doi: 10.1007/s11160-023-09760-z. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
Australia's fisheries have experience in responding individually to specific shocks to stock levels (for example, marine heatwaves, floods) and markets (for example, global financial crisis, food safety access barriers). The COVID-19 pandemic was, however, novel in triggering a series of systemic shocks and disruptions to the activities and operating conditions for all Australia's commercial fisheries sectors including those of the research agencies that provide the information needed for their sustainable management. While these disruptions have a single root cause-the public health impacts and containment responses to the COVID-19 pandemic-their transmission and effects have been varied. We examine both the impacts on Australian fisheries triggered by measures introduced by governments both internationally and domestically in response to the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, and the countermeasures introduced to support continuity in fisheries and aquaculture production and supply chains. Impacts on fisheries production are identified by comparing annual and monthly catch data for Australia's commercial fisheries in 2020 with averages for the last 4-5 years. We combine this with a survey of the short-term disruption to and impacts on research organisations engaged in fisheries monitoring and assessment and the adaptive measures they deployed. The dominant impact identified was triggered by containment measures both within Australia and in export receiving countries which led to loss of export markets and domestic dine-in markets for live or fresh seafood. The most heavily impact fisheries included lobster and abalone (exported live) and specific finfishes (exported fresh or sold live domestically), which experienced short-term reductions in both production and price. At the same time, improved prices and demand for seafood sold into domestic retail channels were observed. The impacts observed were both a function of the disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the countermeasures and support programs introduced by various national and state-level governments across Australia to at least partly mitigate negative impacts on harvesting activities and supply chains. These included protecting fisheries activities from specific restrictive COVID-19 containment measures, pro-actively re-establishing freight links, supporting quota roll-overs, and introducing wage and businesses support packages. Fisheries research organisations were impacted to various degrees, largely determined by the extent to which their field monitoring activities were protected from specific restrictive COVID-19 containment measures by their state-level governments. Responses of these organisations included reducing fisheries dependent and independent data collection as required while developing strategies to continue to provide assessment services, including opportunistic innovations to harvest data from new data sources. Observed short run impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak has emphasised both the vulnerability of fisheries dependent on export markets, live or fresh markets, and long supply chains and the resilience of fisheries research programs. We suggest that further and more comprehensive analysis over a longer time period of the long-run impacts of subsequent waves of variants, extended pandemic containment measures, autonomous and planned adaptive responses would be beneficial for the development of more effective counter measures for when the next major external shock affects Australian fisheries.
澳大利亚渔业在应对鱼类种群水平受到的特定冲击(例如海洋热浪、洪水)和市场冲击(例如全球金融危机、食品安全准入壁垒)方面有经验。然而,新冠疫情引发了一系列系统性冲击,并扰乱了澳大利亚所有商业渔业部门的活动和运营条件,包括那些为渔业可持续管理提供所需信息的研究机构。虽然这些干扰有一个共同的根源——新冠疫情对公共卫生的影响以及防控措施——但其传播和影响却各不相同。我们研究了国际和国内政府为应对新冠疫情爆发而采取的措施对澳大利亚渔业造成的影响,以及为支持渔业和水产养殖生产及供应链的连续性而采取的应对措施。通过将2020年澳大利亚商业渔业的年度和月度捕捞数据与过去4至5年的平均数据进行比较,确定了对渔业生产的影响。我们将此与一项针对从事渔业监测和评估的研究机构所受短期干扰及影响以及它们所采取的适应性措施的调查相结合。所确定的主要影响是由澳大利亚境内以及出口接收国的防控措施引发的,这些措施导致活鲜或新鲜海产品的出口市场和国内堂食市场丧失。受影响最严重的渔业包括龙虾和鲍鱼(活鲜出口)以及特定的有鳍鱼类(新鲜出口或国内活鲜销售),其产量和价格都出现了短期下降。与此同时,观察到进入国内零售渠道的海产品价格上涨且需求增加。所观察到的影响既是新冠疫情造成的干扰的结果,也是澳大利亚各级政府为至少部分减轻对捕捞活动和供应链的负面影响而出台的应对措施和支持计划的结果。这些措施包括保护渔业活动免受新冠疫情特定限制防控措施的影响、积极重建货运联系、支持配额结转以及推出工资和企业支持方案。渔业研究机构受到了不同程度的影响,这在很大程度上取决于其所在州政府在多大程度上保护其野外监测活动免受新冠疫情特定限制防控措施的影响。这些机构的应对措施包括根据需要减少依赖渔业和独立的数据收集,同时制定战略以继续提供评估服务,包括通过机会主义创新从新数据源获取数据。新冠疫情爆发所观察到的短期影响既凸显了依赖出口市场、活鲜或新鲜市场以及长供应链的渔业的脆弱性,也凸显了渔业研究项目的恢复力。我们建议,在更长时间内对后续变种浪潮、延长的疫情防控措施、自主和计划的适应性应对的长期影响进行进一步和更全面的分析,将有利于制定更有效的应对措施,以应对下一次重大外部冲击对澳大利亚渔业的影响。