Brockman Tabetha A, Shaw Olivia, Wiepert Liana, Nguyen Quang Anh, Kelpin Sydney S, West Ian, Albertie Monica, Williams Shantel, Abbenyi Adeline, Stephenson Noreen, Almader-Douglas Diana, Patten Christi A
Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 8;7(1):e84. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.16. eCollection 2023.
Residents of rural areas are underrepresented in research. The aim of this narrative review was to explore studies describing the effectiveness of community engagement strategies with rural communities to promote participant recruitment and participation in clinical research. Following PRISMA guidelines, this narrative review was conducted in June 2020. Our search strategy was built around keywords that included community-engaged research, rural community, and recruitment strategies into clinical research. Content-related descriptive statistics were summarized. The selected articles were distributed into categories of levels of community engagement: inform, consult, involve, collaborate, or co-lead. The search resulted in 2,473 identified studies of which forty-eight met inclusion criteria. Of these, 47.1% were randomized controlled trials. The most common levels of engagement were consultation (n = 24 studies) and collaboration (n = 15), while very few focused on informing (n = 2) and co-leadership (n = 2). Strategies, limitations, and findings are discussed for each level of community engagement. This narrative addressed a gap in knowledge regarding participant recruitment in rural communities in relation to assistance from community members. Community engagement contributed to the success of the research, especially in recruitment, participation, and building trust and partnership.
农村地区居民在研究中的代表性不足。本叙述性综述的目的是探索描述与农村社区开展社区参与策略以促进参与者招募和参与临床研究有效性的研究。按照系统评价和Meta分析优先报告项目(PRISMA)指南,本叙述性综述于2020年6月进行。我们的检索策略围绕包括社区参与研究、农村社区以及临床研究招募策略等关键词构建。总结了与内容相关的描述性统计数据。所选文章被分为社区参与水平的类别:告知、咨询、参与、合作或共同领导。检索结果共识别出2473项研究,其中48项符合纳入标准。在这些研究中,47.1%为随机对照试验。最常见的参与水平是咨询(24项研究)和合作(15项),而很少有研究关注告知(2项)和共同领导(2项)。针对每个社区参与水平讨论了策略、局限性和研究结果。本叙述性综述填补了关于农村社区参与者招募方面在社区成员协助相关知识上的空白。社区参与有助于研究的成功,特别是在招募、参与以及建立信任和伙伴关系方面。