Indigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD014874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014874.pub2.
Acceptable, effective and feasible support strategies (interventions) for parents experiencing complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) symptoms or with a history of childhood maltreatment may offer an opportunity to support parental recovery, reduce the risk of intergenerational transmission of trauma and improve life-course trajectories for children and future generations. However, evidence relating to the effect of interventions has not been synthesised to provide a comprehensive review of available support strategies. This evidence synthesis is critical to inform further research, practice and policy approaches in this emerging area.
To assess the effects of interventions provided to support parents who were experiencing CPTSD symptoms or who had experienced childhood maltreatment (or both), on parenting capacity and parental psychological or socio-emotional wellbeing.
In October 2021 we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, six other databases and two trials registers, together with checking references and contacting experts to identify additional studies.
All variants of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any intervention delivered in the perinatal period designed to support parents experiencing CPTSD symptoms or with a history of childhood maltreatment (or both), to any active or inactive control. Primary outcomes were parental psychological or socio-emotional wellbeing and parenting capacity between pregnancy and up to two years postpartum.
Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of trials for inclusion, extracted data using a pre-designed data extraction form, and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence. We contacted study authors for additional information as required. We analysed continuous data using mean difference (MD) for outcomes using a single measure, and standardised mean difference (SMD) for outcomes using multiple measures, and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data. All data are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We undertook meta-analyses using random-effects models.
We included evidence from 1925 participants in 15 RCTs that investigated the effect of 17 interventions. All included studies were published after 2005. Interventions included seven parenting interventions, eight psychological interventions and two service system approaches. The studies were funded by major research councils, government departments and philanthropic/charitable organisations. All evidence was of low or very low certainty. Parenting interventions Evidence was very uncertain from a study (33 participants) assessing the effects of a parenting intervention compared to attention control on trauma-related symptoms, and psychological wellbeing symptoms (postpartum depression), in mothers who had experienced childhood maltreatment and were experiencing current parenting risk factors. Evidence suggested that parenting interventions may improve parent-child relationships slightly compared to usual service provision (SMD 0.45, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.96; I = 60%; 2 studies, 153 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be little or no difference between parenting interventions and usual perinatal service in parenting skills including nurturance, supportive presence and reciprocity (SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.58; I = 0%; 4 studies, 149 participants; low-certainty evidence). No studies assessed the effects of parenting interventions on parents' substance use, relationship quality or self-harm. Psychological interventions Psychological interventions may result in little or no difference in trauma-related symptoms compared to usual care (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.31; I = 39%; 4 studies, 247 participants; low-certainty evidence). Psychological interventions may make little or no difference compared to usual care to depression symptom severity (8 studies, 507 participants, low-certainty evidence, SMD -0.34, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.03; I = 63%). An interpersonally focused cognitive behavioural analysis system of psychotherapy may slightly increase the number of pregnant women who quit smoking compared to usual smoking cessation therapy and prenatal care (189 participants, low-certainty evidence). A psychological intervention may slightly improve parents' relationship quality compared to usual care (1 study, 67 participants, low-certainty evidence). Benefits for parent-child relationships were very uncertain (26 participants, very low-certainty evidence), while there may be a slight improvement in parenting skills compared to usual care (66 participants, low-certainty evidence). No studies assessed the effects of psychological interventions on parents' self-harm. Service system approaches One service system approach assessed the effect of a financial empowerment education programme, with and without trauma-informed peer support, compared to usual care for parents with low incomes. The interventions increased depression slightly (52 participants, low-certainty evidence). No studies assessed the effects of service system interventions on parents' trauma-related symptoms, substance use, relationship quality, self-harm, parent-child relationships or parenting skills.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently a lack of high-quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions to improve parenting capacity or parental psychological or socio-emotional wellbeing in parents experiencing CPTSD symptoms or who have experienced childhood maltreatment (or both). This lack of methodological rigour and high risk of bias made it difficult to interpret the findings of this review. Overall, results suggest that parenting interventions may slightly improve parent-child relationships but have a small, unimportant effect on parenting skills. Psychological interventions may help some women stop smoking in pregnancy, and may have small benefits on parents' relationships and parenting skills. A financial empowerment programme may slightly worsen depression symptoms. While potential beneficial effects were small, the importance of a positive effect in a small number of parents must be considered when making treatment and care decisions. There is a need for further high-quality research into effective strategies for this population.
针对经历复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)症状或有儿童期虐待史的父母,提供可接受、有效且可行的支持策略(干预措施),可能为支持父母康复、降低创伤代际传递的风险以及改善儿童和后代的人生轨迹提供机会。然而,有关干预措施效果的证据尚未进行综合分析,以提供对现有支持策略的全面审查。这一证据综合分析对于为这一新兴领域提供进一步的研究、实践和政策方法至关重要。
评估针对经历 CPTSD 症状或有儿童期虐待史(或两者兼有)的父母的干预措施对养育能力和父母心理或社会情感健康的影响。
我们于 2021 年 10 月检索了 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、另外六个数据库和两个试验注册库,并查阅了参考文献和联系了专家以确定其他研究。
所有变体的随机对照试验(RCT),比较了在围产期提供的任何旨在支持经历 CPTSD 症状或有儿童期虐待史(或两者兼有)的父母的干预措施与任何积极或消极的对照。主要结局是父母在怀孕和产后两年内的心理或社会情感健康和养育能力。
两位综述作者独立评估了试验纳入的资格,使用预先设计的数据提取表格提取数据,并评估了风险偏倚和证据确定性。我们根据需要联系了研究作者以获取额外的信息。我们使用单一指标的均数差(MD)和多个指标的标准化均数差(SMD)分析连续数据,使用二分类数据的风险比(RR)。所有数据均以 95%置信区间(CI)表示。我们使用随机效应模型进行了 meta 分析。
我们纳入了来自 15 项 RCT 的 1925 名参与者的证据,这些研究调查了 17 种干预措施的效果。所有纳入的研究均发表于 2005 年之后。干预措施包括七种养育干预措施、八种心理干预措施和两种服务系统方法。这些研究由主要研究理事会、政府部门和慈善/慈善组织资助。所有证据的确定性均为低或极低。
一项研究(33 名参与者)评估了与注意力控制相比,针对经历儿童期虐待且当前存在养育风险因素的父母的创伤相关症状和心理幸福感(产后抑郁)的养育干预措施的效果,该研究的证据非常不确定。证据表明,与常规服务相比,养育干预措施可能会略微改善亲子关系(SMD 0.45,95%CI -0.06 至 0.96;I = 60%;2 项研究,153 名参与者;低确定性证据)。养育干预措施与常规围产期服务在养育技能方面,包括养育、支持性存在和互惠方面可能差异不大或没有差异(SMD 0.25,95%CI -0.07 至 0.58;I = 0%;4 项研究,149 名参与者;低确定性证据)。没有研究评估养育干预措施对父母的物质使用、关系质量或自伤的影响。
与常规护理相比,心理干预措施可能对创伤相关症状没有影响或影响很小(SMD -0.05,95%CI -0.40 至 0.31;I = 39%;4 项研究,247 名参与者;低确定性证据)。与常规护理相比,心理干预措施对抑郁症状严重程度可能没有影响或影响很小(8 项研究,507 名参与者,低确定性证据,SMD -0.34,95%CI -0.66 至 -0.03;I = 63%)。人际间聚焦的认知行为分析系统心理疗法可能会略微增加与常规戒烟治疗和产前保健相比,怀孕女性戒烟的人数(189 名参与者,低确定性证据)。与常规护理相比,心理干预可能会略微改善父母的关系质量(1 项研究,67 名参与者,低确定性证据)。对亲子关系的益处非常不确定(26 名参与者,极低确定性证据),而与常规护理相比,养育技能可能略有改善(66 名参与者,低确定性证据)。没有研究评估心理干预措施对父母自伤的影响。
一种服务系统方法评估了一项经济赋权教育计划,该计划与创伤知情的同伴支持相结合,与常规护理相比,针对收入较低的父母。干预措施略微增加了抑郁(52 名参与者,低确定性证据)。没有研究评估服务系统干预措施对父母的创伤相关症状、物质使用、关系质量、自伤、亲子关系或养育技能的影响。
目前,关于干预措施改善经历 CPTSD 症状或有儿童期虐待史(或两者兼有)的父母的养育能力或父母心理或社会情感健康的有效性的高质量证据很少。这一缺乏方法学严谨性和高偏倚风险使得难以解释本综述的结果。总体而言,结果表明养育干预措施可能略微改善亲子关系,但对养育技能的影响较小。心理干预措施可能有助于一些孕妇在怀孕期间戒烟,并可能对父母的关系和养育技能产生小的、不重要的益处。经济赋权计划可能会略微加重抑郁症状。虽然潜在的有益效果很小,但在做出治疗和护理决策时,必须考虑对少数父母的积极影响。需要进一步进行高质量的研究,以确定针对这一人群的有效策略。