Suppr超能文献

旁观者身体限制、远程协助心肺复苏时胸外按压延迟与院外心脏骤停后结局的关系。

Association between bystander physical limitations, delays in chest compression during telecommunicator-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

机构信息

Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Emergency Medical Services Division, Public Health Seattle and King County, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2023 Jul;188:109816. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109816. Epub 2023 May 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Promptly initiated bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Many OHCA patients require repositioning to a firm surface. We examined the association between repositioning, chest compression (CC) delay, and patient outcomes.

METHODS

We used a quality improvement registry from review of 9-1-1 dispatch audio recordings of OHCA among adults eligible for telecommunicator-assisted CPR (T-CPR) between 2013 and 2021. OHCA was categorized into 3 groups: CC not delayed, CC delayed due to bystander physical limitations to reposition the patient, or CC delayed for other (non-physical) reasons. The primary outcome was the repositioning interval, defined as the interval between the start of positioning instructions and CC onset. We used logistic regression to assess the odds ratio of survival according to CPR group, adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 3,482 OHCA patients eligible for T-CPR, CPR was not delayed in 1,223 (35%), delayed due to repositioning in 1,413 (41%), and delayed for other reasons in 846 (24%). The repositioning interval was longest for the physical limitation delay group (137 secs, IQR-148) compared to the other delay group (81 secs, IQR-70) and the no delay group (51 secs, IQR-32) (p < 0.001). Unadjusted survival was lowest in the physical limitation delay group (11%) versus the no delay (17%) and other delay (19%) groups and persisted after adjustment (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Bystander physical limitations are a common barrier to repositioning patients to begin CPR and are associated with lower likelihood of receiving CPR, longer times to begin CC, and lower survival.

摘要

背景

及时进行旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)可提高院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的生存率。许多 OHCA 患者需要重新定位到坚硬的表面。我们研究了重新定位与胸外按压(CC)延迟以及患者预后之间的关系。

方法

我们使用了一项质量改进计划,对 2013 年至 2021 年期间符合远程通讯员辅助 CPR(T-CPR)的成年人的 9-1-1 调度音频记录进行 OHCA 回顾,从中纳入了该研究。OHCA 分为三组:CC 未延迟、CC 因旁观者身体限制而延迟重新定位患者和 CC 因其他(非身体)原因而延迟。主要结局是重新定位间隔,定义为开始定位指令与 CC 开始之间的间隔。我们使用逻辑回归来评估根据 CPR 组调整潜在混杂因素后生存的优势比。

结果

在 3482 名符合 T-CPR 条件的 OHCA 患者中,1223 名(35%)的 CPR 未延迟,1413 名(41%)因重新定位而延迟,846 名(24%)因其他原因而延迟。与其他延迟组(81 秒,IQR-70)和无延迟组(51 秒,IQR-32)相比,因身体限制而延迟的组的重新定位间隔最长(137 秒,IQR-148)(p<0.001)。未调整的生存率在因身体限制而延迟的组中最低(11%),与无延迟(17%)和其他延迟(19%)组相比,调整后仍有差异(p=0.009)。

结论

旁观者的身体限制是重新定位患者开始 CPR 的常见障碍,与接受 CPR 的可能性降低、开始 CC 的时间延长以及生存率降低有关。

相似文献

2
Conventional Versus Compression-Only Versus No-Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.
Circulation. 2016 Dec 20;134(25):2060-2070. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023831. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
5
Barriers to the Initiation of Telecommunicator-CPR during 9-1-1 Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Calls: A Qualitative Study.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024;28(1):118-125. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2183533. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
10
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: Potential for Improvements in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e017930. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017930. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

2
Bystander availability, CPR uptake, and AED use during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Resusc Plus. 2025 Apr 30;24:100969. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100969. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Knowledge and attitudes towards performing resuscitation among seniors - a population-based study.
Arch Public Health. 2024 May 8;82(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01301-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Prone Dispatch-Directed CPR in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Two Successful Cases.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(2):192-195. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2058130. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
2
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Basic Life Support.
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:98-114. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
3
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: Potential for Improvements in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e017930. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017930. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
5
Telephone CPR: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.
Open Access Emerg Med. 2020 Sep 7;12:193-200. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S259700. eCollection 2020.
6
The optimal surface for delivery of CPR: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Resuscitation. 2020 Oct;155:159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.07.020. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
7
Prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A scoping and expanded grey literature review for the COVID-19 pandemic.
Resuscitation. 2020 Oct;155:103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
8
Phone CPR and barriers affecting life-saving seconds.
Acta Clin Belg. 2021 Dec;76(6):427-432. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2020.1752454. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
9
Telecommunicator Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2020 Mar 24;141(12):e686-e700. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000744. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
10
Gender Disparities Among Adult Recipients of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Public.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Aug;11(8):e004710. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004710.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验