Bradley Julie A, Liang Xiaoying, Mailhot Vega Raymond B, Liu Chunbo, Brooks Eric D, Burchianti Teena, Viviers Emma, Dagan Roi, Oladeru Oluwadamilola T, Morris Christopher G, Mendenhall Nancy P
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Int J Part Ther. 2023 Mar 24;9(4):269-278. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-22-00034.1. eCollection 2023 Spring.
To determine the rib fracture rate in a cohort of patients with breast cancer treated with proton therapy.
From a prospective database, we identified 225 patients treated with proton therapy between 2012 and 2020 (223 women; 2 men). Clinical and dosimetric data were extracted, the cumulative incidence method assessed rib fracture rate, and Fine-Gray tests assessed prognostic significance of select variables. In-field rib fracture was defined as a fracture that occurred in a rib located within the 10% isodose line. Out-of-field rib fracture was defined as a fracture occurring in a rib location outside of the 10% isodose line.
Of the patients, 74% had left-sided breast cancer; 5%, bilateral; and 21%, right-sided. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans showed normality in 20%, osteopenia in 34%, and osteoporosis in 6% (test not performed in 40%). Additionally, 57% received an aromatase inhibitor. Target volumes were breast ± internal mammary nodes (IMNs) (16%), breast and comprehensive regional lymphatics (32%), chest wall ± IMNs (1%), and chest wall/comprehensive regional lymphatics (51%). Passive-scattered proton therapy was used for 41% of patients, 58% underwent pencil-beam scanning (PBS), and 1% underwent a combination (passive scattering/PBS), with 85% of patients receiving a boost. Median follow-up was 3.1 years, with 97% having >12-month follow-up. The 3-year cumulative in-field rib fracture incidence was 3.7%. Eight patients developed in-field rib fractures (1 symptomatic, 7 imaging identified) for a 0.4% symptomatic rib fracture rate. Median time from radiation completion to rib fracture identification was 1.8 years (fractures were identified within 2.2 years for 7 of 8 patients). No variables were associated with rib fracture on univariate analysis. Three fractures developed outside the radiation field (0.9% cumulative incidence of out-of-field rib fracture).
In this series of patients with breast cancer treated with proton therapy, the 3-year rib fracture rates remain low (in-field 3.7%; symptomatic 0.4%). As in photon therapy, the asymptomatic rate may be underestimated owing to a lack of routine surveillance imaging. However, patients experiencing symptomatic rib fractures after proton therapy for breast cancer are rare.
确定接受质子治疗的乳腺癌患者队列中的肋骨骨折发生率。
从一个前瞻性数据库中,我们识别出2012年至2020年间接受质子治疗的225例患者(223名女性;2名男性)。提取临床和剂量学数据,采用累积发病率法评估肋骨骨折发生率,采用Fine-Gray检验评估选定变量的预后意义。野内肋骨骨折定义为发生在10%等剂量线内的肋骨骨折。野外肋骨骨折定义为发生在10%等剂量线外的肋骨骨折。
患者中,74%患有左侧乳腺癌;5%为双侧;21%为右侧。双能X线吸收法扫描显示,20%正常,34%骨质减少,6%骨质疏松(40%未进行该检查)。此外,57%接受了芳香化酶抑制剂治疗。靶区包括乳腺±内乳淋巴结(IMNs)(16%)、乳腺和综合区域淋巴结(32%)、胸壁±IMNs(1%)以及胸壁/综合区域淋巴结(51%)。41%的患者采用被动散射质子治疗,58%接受笔形束扫描(PBS),1%采用联合治疗(被动散射/PBS),85%的患者接受了加量照射。中位随访时间为3.1年,97%的患者随访时间超过12个月。3年累积野内肋骨骨折发生率为3.7%。8例患者发生野内肋骨骨折(1例有症状,7例经影像学检查发现),症状性肋骨骨折发生率为0.4%。从放疗结束到肋骨骨折确诊的中位时间为1.8年(8例患者中有7例在2.2年内确诊骨折)。单因素分析中没有变量与肋骨骨折相关。3例骨折发生在放疗野外(野外肋骨骨折累积发生率为0.9%)。
在这组接受质子治疗的乳腺癌患者中,3年肋骨骨折发生率仍然较低(野内3.7%;有症状者0.4%)。与光子治疗一样,由于缺乏常规监测影像学检查,无症状发生率可能被低估。然而,乳腺癌质子治疗后出现症状性肋骨骨折的患者很少见。