Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) & Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, 08036, Spain.
Future Oncol. 2023 Apr;19(12):829-843. doi: 10.2217/fon-2023-0062. Epub 2023 May 12.
Evidence on time-based metrics for cancers diagnosed through emergency presentation is lacking. We examined the duration of intervals from first symptoms to cancer diagnosis in the emergency versus primary care (PC) presentation route. Retrospective study of outpatients diagnosed with 15 solid cancers over 5 years. The outcome was the length of prediagnostic intervals by diagnostic route. Median intervals in emergency presenters (n = 3167) were shorter than in PC presenters (n = 2215). However, intervals in emergency presenters with three or more prior PC consultations were similar to PC but remarkably longer than in those with one or two and no consultations. As we provide new interval measures for the emergency diagnostic pathway, results highlight the contribution of prior consultations to interval lengths.
有关通过急诊就诊诊断出的癌症的基于时间的指标的证据尚不足。我们研究了从首次症状到癌症诊断的时间间隔在急诊和初级保健(PC)就诊途径之间的差异。这是一项对 5 年内被诊断出 15 种实体癌的门诊患者进行的回顾性研究。研究的结局是通过诊断途径预测的诊断前间隔的长度。在急诊就诊者(n=3167)中,中位数间隔短于 PC 就诊者(n=2215)。然而,在有三次或更多次 PC 就诊的急诊就诊者中,间隔与 PC 相似,但与一次或两次就诊且没有就诊的患者相比,间隔明显更长。由于我们提供了急诊诊断途径的新的间隔测量方法,因此结果强调了先前就诊对间隔长度的贡献。