Suppr超能文献

富血小板血浆在干细胞治疗中的应用——试图澄清一个常见的公众误解。

Application of Platelet-Rich Plasma as a Stem Cell Treatment - an Attempt to Clarify a Common Public Misconception.

机构信息

School of Biology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, 40450, Selangor, Malaysia.

Department of Oral Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, MAHSA University, Selangor, 42610, Malaysia.

出版信息

Curr Mol Med. 2024;24(6):689-701. doi: 10.2174/1566524023666230511152646.

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the practice of regenerative medicine by health practitioners and direct-to-consumer businesses globally. Among different tools of regenerative medicine, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and stem cell-based therapies have received considerable attention. The use of PRP, in particular, has gained popularity due to its easy access, simple processing techniques, and regenerative potential. However, it is important to address a common misconception amongst the general public equating to PRP and stem cells due to the demonstrated efficacy of PRP in treating musculoskeletal and dermatological disorders. Notably, PRP promotes regeneration by providing growth factors or other paracrine factors only. Therefore, it cannot replenish or replace the lost cells in conditions where a large number of cells are required to regenerate tissues and/or organs. In such cases, cellbased therapies are the preferred option. Additionally, other tools of regenerative medicine, such as bioprinting, organoids, and mechanobiology also rely on stem cells for their success. Hence, healthcare and commercial entities offering direct-to-customer regenerative therapies should not mislead the public by claiming that the application of PRP is a stem cell-based therapy. Furthermore, it is important for regulatory bodies to strictly monitor these profit-driven entities to prevent them from providing unregulated regenerative treatments and services that claim a broad variety of benefits with little proof of efficacy, safety concerns, and obscure scientific justification.

摘要

近年来,全球的医疗从业者和面向消费者的企业在实践再生医学方面有了显著的增长。在不同的再生医学工具中,富血小板血浆 (PRP) 和基于干细胞的疗法受到了相当大的关注。特别是 PRP 的使用因其易于获取、简单的处理技术和再生潜力而受到欢迎。然而,需要解决一个普遍存在的误解,即公众普遍认为 PRP 和干细胞是等同的,因为 PRP 在治疗肌肉骨骼和皮肤疾病方面的疗效已得到证实。值得注意的是,PRP 通过提供生长因子或其他旁分泌因子来促进再生。因此,在需要大量细胞来再生组织和/或器官的情况下,它不能补充或替代丢失的细胞。在这种情况下,基于细胞的疗法是首选。此外,再生医学的其他工具,如生物打印、类器官和机械生物学,也依赖于干细胞才能取得成功。因此,提供面向客户的再生治疗的医疗保健和商业实体不应该通过声称 PRP 的应用是基于干细胞的疗法来误导公众。此外,监管机构必须严格监督这些以盈利为目的的实体,以防止它们提供不受监管的再生治疗和服务,这些治疗和服务声称具有广泛的益处,但几乎没有疗效、安全问题和模糊的科学依据的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验