Suppr超能文献

推荐用于颈部扭伤相关疾病临床试验的核心结局测量集。

Recommendations for a core outcome measurement set for clinical trials in whiplash associated disorders.

机构信息

Recover Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.

NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence: Better Health Outcomes for Compensable Injury, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.

出版信息

Pain. 2023 Oct 1;164(10):2265-2272. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002926. Epub 2023 May 10.

Abstract

Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of treatments for whiplash associated disorders (WAD) hinders effective data pooling and conclusions about treatment effectiveness. A multidisciplinary International Steering Committee recently recommended 6 core outcome domains: Physical Functioning, Perceived Recovery, Work and Social Functioning, Psychological Functioning, Quality of Life and Pain. This study aimed to reach consensus and recommend a core outcome set (COS) representing each of the 6 domains. Forty-three patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were identified for Physical Functioning, 2 for perceived recovery, 37 for psychological functioning, 17 for quality of life, and 2 for pain intensity. They were appraised in 5 systematic reviews following COSMIN methodology. No PROMs of Work and Social Functioning in WAD were identified. No PROMs had undergone evaluation of content validity in patients with WAD, but some had moderate-to-high-quality evidence for sufficient internal structure. Based on these results, the International Steering Committee reached 100% consensus to recommend the following COS: Neck Disability Index or Whiplash Disability Questionnaire (Physical Functioning), the Global Rating of Change Scale (Perceived Recovery), one of the Pictorial Fear of Activity Scale-Cervical, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, or Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (Psychological Functioning), EQ-5D-3L or SF-6D (Quality of Life), numeric pain rating scale or visual analogue scale (Pain), and single-item questions pertaining to current work status and percent of usual work (Work and Social Functioning). These recommendations reflect the current status of research of PROMs of the 6 core outcome domains and may be modified as evidence grows.

摘要

在针对与挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)的治疗的临床试验中,结果报告不一致阻碍了有效数据汇总和治疗效果的结论。一个多学科的国际指导委员会最近推荐了 6 个核心结局领域:身体功能、感知恢复、工作和社会功能、心理功能、生活质量和疼痛。本研究旨在达成共识并推荐代表每个 6 个领域的核心结局集(COS)。为身体功能确定了 43 个患者报告的结局测量(PROM),为感知恢复确定了 2 个,为心理功能确定了 37 个,为生活质量确定了 17 个,为疼痛强度确定了 2 个。它们按照 COSMIN 方法在 5 项系统评价中进行了评估。未确定 WAD 中工作和社会功能的任何 PROM。没有 PROM 对 WAD 患者进行了内容有效性评估,但有些具有足够内部结构的中度至高度质量证据。基于这些结果,国际指导委员会达成了 100%的共识,推荐以下 COS:颈痛残疾指数或挥鞭样损伤问卷(身体功能)、全球变化量表评级(感知恢复)、图片恐惧活动量表 - 颈椎、疼痛自我效能问卷、疼痛灾难化量表、哈佛创伤问卷或创伤后诊断量表之一(心理功能)、EQ-5D-3L 或 SF-6D(生活质量)、数字疼痛评分量表或视觉模拟评分量表(疼痛)以及与当前工作状态和通常工作百分比相关的单项问题(工作和社会功能)。这些建议反映了 6 个核心结局领域的 PROM 研究的现状,随着证据的增加可能会进行修改。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验