Igi Mae, Miller Jenna, Sayers Kia, Smith David L, Toshav Aran, Batte Catherine, Spieler Bradley, Danrad Raman
From the Louisiana State University at New Orleans, New Orleans, LA.
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2023;47(3):390-395. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001434. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
Computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography performed on a detector-based spectral scanner helps more closely approximate severity of stenosis with nuclear medicine and cardiac catheterization tests compared with single-energy CT (SECT) in patients with an original CAD-RADS score of 3 and higher.
This retrospective trial was conducted between January 2017 and December 2019 and included 52 patients with a CAD-RADS score of 3 and higher. Two reading sessions were performed 6 weeks apart. The first reading session was performed using only conventional images and the second reading session was performed using spectral results. Detector-based spectral CT CAD-RADS scores were compared with cardiac stress test and/or cardiac catheterization results for final characterization of stenosis in 41 segments from 32 patients. The mean CAD-RADS score was calculated for both the conventional images and spectral images.
The CAD-RADS score for SECT and the score for spectral CT for the 41 segments were compared. Available associated stress test and/or cardiac catheterization results were also compared with CAD-RADS scores. In 51% (21/41), a diagnosis concordant with best practices results was achieved with the help of spectral CT results. A mean CAD-RADS score of 3.56 was obtained using spectral results, compared with 3.93 using conventional images. A 2-tailed paired t test determined the difference to be significant with a P value of 0.007.
Computed tomography coronary angiography is feasible on a detector-based spectral CT scanner and can improve diagnostic confidence over SECT angiography in patients with an original CAD-RADS score of 3 and higher.
与单能CT(SECT)相比,在基于探测器的光谱扫描仪上进行的计算机断层扫描(CT)冠状动脉造影,有助于更精确地评估原始CAD-RADS评分3及以上患者的狭窄严重程度,其结果更接近核医学和心脏导管检查。
本回顾性试验于2017年1月至2019年12月进行,纳入了52例CAD-RADS评分3及以上的患者。相隔6周进行两次读片。第一次读片仅使用传统图像,第二次读片使用光谱结果。将基于探测器的光谱CT的CAD-RADS评分与心脏负荷试验和/或心脏导管检查结果进行比较,以最终确定32例患者41个节段的狭窄情况。计算传统图像和光谱图像的平均CAD-RADS评分。
比较了41个节段的SECT的CAD-RADS评分和光谱CT的评分。还将可用的相关负荷试验和/或心脏导管检查结果与CAD-RADS评分进行了比较。在51%(21/41)的病例中,借助光谱CT结果实现了与最佳实践结果一致的诊断。光谱结果的平均CAD-RADS评分为3.56,而传统图像的评分为3.93。双尾配对t检验确定差异具有统计学意义,P值为0.007。
在基于探测器的光谱CT扫描仪上进行计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影是可行的,对于原始CAD-RADS评分3及以上的患者,与SECT血管造影相比,可提高诊断信心。