Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, Ultrasomics Artificial Intelligence X-Lab, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2313674. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13674.
To optimize the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) decision aids and reduce workload in thyroid nodule management, it is critical to incorporate personalized AI into the decision-making processes of radiologists with varying levels of expertise.
To develop an optimized integration of AI decision aids for reducing radiologists' workload while maintaining diagnostic performance compared with traditional AI-assisted strategy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this diagnostic study, a retrospective set of 1754 ultrasonographic images of 1048 patients with 1754 thyroid nodules from July 1, 2018, to July 31, 2019, was used to build an optimized strategy based on how 16 junior and senior radiologists incorporated AI-assisted diagnosis results with different image features. In the prospective set of this diagnostic study, 300 ultrasonographic images of 268 patients with 300 thyroid nodules from May 1 to December 31, 2021, were used to compare the optimized strategy with the traditional all-AI strategy in terms of diagnostic performance and workload reduction. Data analyses were completed in September 2022.
The retrospective set of images was used to develop an optimized integration of AI decision aids for junior and senior radiologists based on the selection of AI-assisted significant or nonsignificant features. In the prospective set of images, the diagnostic performance, time-based cost, and assisted diagnosis were compared between the optimized strategy and the traditional all-AI strategy.
The retrospective set included 1754 ultrasonographic images from 1048 patients (mean [SD] age, 42.1 [13.2] years; 749 women [71.5%]) with 1754 thyroid nodules (mean [SD] size, 16.4 [10.6] mm); 748 nodules (42.6%) were benign, and 1006 (57.4%) were malignant. The prospective set included 300 ultrasonographic images from 268 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.7 [14.1] years; 194 women [72.4%]) with 300 thyroid nodules (mean [SD] size, 17.2 [6.8] mm); 125 nodules (41.7%) were benign, and 175 (58.3%) were malignant. For junior radiologists, the ultrasonographic features that were not improved by AI assistance included cystic or almost completely cystic nodules, anechoic nodules, spongiform nodules, and nodules smaller than 5 mm, whereas for senior radiologists the features that were not improved by AI assistance were cystic or almost completely cystic nodules, anechoic nodules, spongiform nodules, very hypoechoic nodules, nodules taller than wide, lobulated or irregular nodules, and extrathyroidal extension. Compared with the traditional all-AI strategy, the optimized strategy was associated with increased mean task completion times for junior radiologists (reader 11, from 15.2 seconds [95% CI, 13.2-17.2 seconds] to 19.4 seconds [95% CI, 15.6-23.3 seconds]; reader 12, from 12.7 seconds [95% CI, 11.4-13.9 seconds] to 15.6 seconds [95% CI, 13.6-17.7 seconds]), but shorter times for senior radiologists (reader 14, from 19.4 seconds [95% CI, 18.1-20.7 seconds] to 16.8 seconds [95% CI, 15.3-18.3 seconds]; reader 16, from 12.5 seconds [95% CI, 12.1-12.9 seconds] to 10.0 seconds [95% CI, 9.5-10.5 seconds]). There was no significant difference in sensitivity (range, 91%-100%) or specificity (range, 94%-98%) between the 2 strategies for readers 11 to 16.
This diagnostic study suggests that an optimized AI strategy in thyroid nodule management may reduce diagnostic time-based costs without sacrificing diagnostic accuracy for senior radiologists, while the traditional all-AI strategy may still be more beneficial for junior radiologists.
为了优化人工智能(AI)决策辅助工具的整合并减少甲状腺结节管理中的工作量,将个性化 AI 纳入具有不同专业水平的放射科医生的决策过程至关重要。
开发一种优化的 AI 决策辅助工具的整合方法,在保持诊断性能的同时降低放射科医生的工作量,与传统的 AI 辅助策略相比。
设计、设置和参与者:在这项诊断研究中,使用了 2018 年 7 月 1 日至 2019 年 7 月 31 日期间的 1048 名患者的 1754 个超声图像的回顾性数据集,用于构建基于 16 名初级和高级放射科医生如何结合不同图像特征来使用 AI 辅助诊断结果的优化策略。在这项诊断研究的前瞻性数据集部分,使用 2021 年 5 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间的 268 名患者的 300 个超声图像,比较优化策略与传统的全 AI 策略在诊断性能和降低工作量方面的差异。数据分析于 2022 年 9 月完成。
回顾性数据集用于为初级和高级放射科医生开发基于 AI 辅助显著或非显著特征选择的 AI 决策辅助工具的优化整合。在前瞻性数据集部分,比较了优化策略与传统的全 AI 策略在诊断性能、基于时间的成本和辅助诊断方面的差异。
回顾性数据集包括 1754 个来自 1048 名患者(平均[SD]年龄,42.1[13.2]岁;749 名女性[71.5%])的超声图像,这些患者有 1754 个甲状腺结节(平均[SD]大小,16.4[10.6]mm);748 个结节(42.6%)为良性,1006 个(57.4%)为恶性。前瞻性数据集包括 268 名患者的 300 个超声图像(平均[SD]年龄,41.7[14.1]岁;194 名女性[72.4%]),这些患者有 300 个甲状腺结节(平均[SD]大小,17.2[6.8]mm);125 个结节(41.7%)为良性,175 个(58.3%)为恶性。对于初级放射科医生,AI 辅助没有改善的超声特征包括囊性或几乎完全囊性结节、无回声结节、海绵状结节和小于 5mm 的结节,而对于高级放射科医生,AI 辅助没有改善的特征包括囊性或几乎完全囊性结节、无回声结节、海绵状结节、极低回声结节、高宽比结节、分叶状或不规则结节和甲状腺外延伸。与传统的全 AI 策略相比,优化策略与初级放射科医生的平均任务完成时间增加有关(读者 11,从 15.2 秒[95%CI,13.2-17.2 秒]增加到 19.4 秒[95%CI,15.6-23.3 秒];读者 12,从 12.7 秒[95%CI,11.4-13.9 秒]增加到 15.6 秒[95%CI,13.6-17.7 秒]),但高级放射科医生的时间更短(读者 14,从 19.4 秒[95%CI,18.1-20.7 秒]减少到 16.8 秒[95%CI,15.3-18.3 秒];读者 16,从 12.5 秒[95%CI,12.1-12.9 秒]减少到 10.0 秒[95%CI,9.5-10.5 秒])。对于读者 11 到 16,两种策略在敏感性(范围,91%-100%)或特异性(范围,94%-98%)方面没有显著差异。
这项诊断研究表明,在甲状腺结节管理中,一种优化的 AI 策略可能会降低基于时间的诊断成本,而不会牺牲高级放射科医生的诊断准确性,而传统的全 AI 策略可能仍然对初级放射科医生更有益。