Suppr超能文献

动态脑电图与常规脑电图对首次单次无诱因发作患者的诊断准确性

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ambulatory EEG vs Routine EEG in Patients With First Single Unprovoked Seizure.

作者信息

Hernandez-Ronquillo Lizbeth, Thorpe Lilian, Feng Cindy, Hunter Gary, Dash Dianne, Hussein Tabrez, Dolinsky Chelsea, Waterhouse Karen, Roy Pragma Laboni, Jette Nathalie

机构信息

Community Health and Epidemiology (LH-R, LT), Saskatoon, SK; Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine (LH-R, GH.), Saskatoon, SK; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (CF), Halifax, NS; Neurophysiology Laboratory (DD, CD), Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, SK; Neurophysiology Laboratory (TH), BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC; Neuromodulation/Epilepsy Programs (KW), Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, SK; Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine (PLR), Lakeridge Health Oshawa, Oshawa, ON; Department of Neurology and Population Health Science & Policy (NJ), NY.

出版信息

Neurol Clin Pract. 2023 Jun;13(3):e200160. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200160. Epub 2023 May 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ambulatory EEG (aEEG) at detecting interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs)/seizures compared with routine EEG (rEEG) and repetitive/second rEEG in patients with a first single unprovoked seizure (FSUS). We also evaluated the association between IED/seizures on aEEG and seizure recurrence within 1 year of follow-up.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 100 consecutive patients with FSUS at the provincial Single Seizure Clinic. They underwent 3 sequential EEG modalities: first rEEG, second rEEG, and aEEG. Clinical epilepsy diagnosis was ascertained based on the 2014 International League Against Epilepsy definition by a neurologist/epileptologist at the clinic. An EEG-certified epileptologist/neurologist interpreted all 3 EEGs. All patients were followed up for 52 weeks until they had either second unprovoked seizure or maintained single seizure status. Accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and likelihood ratios), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of each EEG modality. Life tables and the Cox proportional hazard model were used to estimate the probability and association of seizure recurrence.

RESULTS

Ambulatory EEG captured IED/seizures with a sensitivity of 72%, compared with 11% for the first rEEG and 22% for the second rEEG. The diagnostic performance of the aEEG was statistically better (AUC: 0.85) compared with the first rEEG (AUC: 0.56) and second rEEG (AUC: 0.60). There were no statistically significant differences between the 3 EEG modalities regarding specificity and positive predictive value. Finally, IED/seizure on the aEEG was associated with more than 3 times the hazard of seizure recurrence.

DISCUSSION

The overall diagnostic accuracy of aEEG at capturing IED/seizures in people presenting with FSUS was higher than the first and second rEEGs. We also found that IED/seizures on the aEEG were associated with an increased risk of seizure recurrence.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class I evidence supporting that, in adults with First Single Unprovoked Seizure (FSUS), 24-h ambulatory EEG has increased sensitivity when compared with routine and repeated EEG.

摘要

背景与目的

评估动态脑电图(aEEG)在检测首次单次无诱因发作(FSUS)患者的发作间期癫痫样放电(IEDs)/癫痫发作方面,与常规脑电图(rEEG)及重复/二次rEEG相比的诊断准确性。我们还评估了aEEG上的IED/癫痫发作与随访1年内癫痫复发之间的关联。

方法

我们在省级单次发作诊所对100例连续的FSUS患者进行了前瞻性评估。他们接受了3种连续的脑电图检查方式:首次rEEG、二次rEEG和aEEG。临床癫痫诊断由诊所的神经科医生/癫痫专家根据2014年国际抗癫痫联盟的定义确定。一位经脑电图认证的癫痫专家/神经科医生解读了所有3份脑电图。所有患者随访52周,直至出现第二次无诱因发作或维持单次发作状态。采用准确性指标(敏感性、特异性、阴性和阳性预测值以及似然比)、受试者工作特征(ROC)分析和曲线下面积(AUC)来评估每种脑电图检查方式的诊断准确性。使用生命表和Cox比例风险模型来估计癫痫复发的概率和关联。

结果

动态脑电图检测到IED/癫痫发作的敏感性为72%,而首次rEEG为11%,二次rEEG为22%。与首次rEEG(AUC:0.56)和二次rEEG(AUC:0.60)相比,aEEG的诊断性能在统计学上更好(AUC:0.85)。在特异性和阳性预测值方面,3种脑电图检查方式之间没有统计学上的显著差异。最后,aEEG上的IED/癫痫发作与癫痫复发风险增加3倍以上相关。

讨论

aEEG在检测FSUS患者的IED/癫痫发作方面的总体诊断准确性高于首次和二次rEEG。我们还发现,aEEG上的IED/癫痫发作与癫痫复发风险增加相关。

证据分类

本研究提供了I类证据,支持在首次单次无诱因发作(FSUS)的成年人中,24小时动态脑电图与常规和重复脑电图相比具有更高的敏感性。

相似文献

4
Indications and yield of ambulatory EEG recordings.门诊脑电图记录的适应证和产量。
Epileptic Disord. 2021 Feb 1;23(1):94-103. doi: 10.1684/epd.2021.1249.
10
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Prolonged Ambulatory Versus Routine EEG.动态脑电图与常规脑电图的诊断准确性
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2016 Apr;47(2):157-61. doi: 10.1177/1550059415607108. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

3
Current state of the epilepsy drug and device pipeline.癫痫药物及器械研发的现状
Epilepsia. 2024 Apr;65(4):833-845. doi: 10.1111/epi.17884. Epub 2024 Feb 12.

本文引用的文献

3
Clinical utility of EEG in diagnosing and monitoring epilepsy in adults.脑电图在成人癫痫诊断和监测中的临床应用。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 May;129(5):1056-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
6
Electroencephalography after a single unprovoked seizure.单次无诱因发作后的脑电图检查
Seizure. 2017 Jul;49:69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
10
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Prolonged Ambulatory Versus Routine EEG.动态脑电图与常规脑电图的诊断准确性
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2016 Apr;47(2):157-61. doi: 10.1177/1550059415607108. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验