Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2023 May;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-001097.
Endoscopic therapy is the recommended primary treatment for most complex colorectal polyps, but high colonic resection rates are reported. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand and compare between specialities, the clinical and non-clinical factors influencing decision making when planning management.
Semi-structured interviews were performed among colonoscopists across the UK. Interviews were conducted virtually and transcribed verbatim. Complex polyps were defined as lesions requiring further management planning rather than those treatable at the time of endoscopy. A thematic analysis was performed. Findings were coded to identify themes and reported narratively.
Twenty colonoscopists were interviewed. Four major themes were identified including gathering information regarding the patient and their polyp, aids to decision making, barriers in achieving optimal management and improving services. Participants advocated endoscopic management where possible. Factors such as younger age, suspicion of malignancy, right colon or difficult polyp location lead towards surgical intervention and were similar between surgical and medical specialties. Availability of expertise, timely endoscopy and challenges in referral pathways were reported barriers to optimal management. Experiences of team decision-making strategies were positive and advocated in improving complex polyp management. Recommendations based on these findings to improve complex polyp management are provided.
The increasing recognition of complex colorectal polyps requires consistency in decision making and access to a full range of treatment options. Colonoscopists advocated the availability of clinical expertise, timely treatment and education in avoiding surgical intervention and providing good patient outcomes. Team decision-making strategies for complex polyps may provide an opportunity to coordinate and improve these issues.
内镜治疗是大多数复杂结直肠息肉的推荐首选治疗方法,但报道的高结肠切除术率。本定性研究的目的是了解和比较各专业之间在规划管理时影响决策的临床和非临床因素。
在英国各地对结肠镜检查医师进行了半结构式访谈。访谈以虚拟方式进行,并逐字记录。复杂息肉被定义为需要进一步管理计划的病变,而不是那些可以在内镜检查时治疗的病变。进行了主题分析。对发现进行编码以识别主题,并以叙述方式报告。
对 20 名结肠镜医师进行了访谈。确定了四个主要主题,包括收集有关患者及其息肉的信息、决策辅助、实现最佳管理的障碍以及改善服务。参与者提倡在可能的情况下进行内镜管理。年龄较小、怀疑恶性肿瘤、右结肠或困难息肉位置等因素导致手术干预,这在外科和内科专业之间是相似的。专家的可用性、及时的内镜检查以及转诊途径的挑战被认为是最佳管理的障碍。团队决策策略的经验是积极的,并提倡改善复杂息肉的管理。根据这些发现提出了改善复杂息肉管理的建议。
越来越多的人认识到复杂的结直肠息肉需要在决策时保持一致,并获得全面的治疗选择。结肠镜医师提倡提供临床专业知识、及时治疗以及教育,以避免手术干预并提供良好的患者结局。复杂息肉的团队决策策略可能为协调和改善这些问题提供了机会。