Suppr超能文献

在初级保健中的衰弱和多重用药。

Frailty and Polypharmacy in Primary Care.

机构信息

General Directorate of Public Health, The Ministry of Health of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.

Family Medicine Department, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Medical Faculty, Bolu, Turkey.

出版信息

Biol Res Nurs. 2023 Oct;25(4):658-663. doi: 10.1177/10998004231179485. Epub 2023 May 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a clinical judgement-based frailty tool developed from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Many studies on the measurement of frailty and its effect on clinical outcomes have been conducted on patients hospitalized, especially in intensive care units. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between polypharmacy and frailty on outpatient older adult patients in primary care.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

This cross-sectional study included 298 patients who were aged ≥65 years and admitted to Yenimahalle Family Health Center between May-2022 and July-2022. Frailty was evaluated by using CFS. Polypharmacy was defined as five medications or more and "excessive polypharmacy" as 10 medications or more. The medications below five are grouped as "no polypharmacy".

RESULTS

There was a statistically significance between age groups, gender, smoking status, marital status, polypharmacy status, and FS ( .003 and η: .20; .001 and Cohen d: .80; .018 and Cohen d: .35; .001 and Cohen d: 1.10 and .001 and η: 1.45 respectively). A strong, positive correlation was found between polypharmacy and the frailty score.

CONCLUSION

Polypharmacy, especially excessive polypharmacy, may be a promising adjunct to frailty in identifying older patients whose health is more likely to worsen. Providers in primary care should also consider frailty when prescribing drugs.

摘要

简介

临床虚弱量表(CFS)是一种基于临床判断的虚弱工具,由加拿大健康老龄化研究开发而来。许多关于虚弱的测量及其对临床结果的影响的研究都是针对住院患者进行的,尤其是在重症监护病房。本研究旨在探讨初级保健门诊老年患者中药物治疗方案与虚弱之间的关系。

材料和方法

本横断面研究纳入了 2022 年 5 月至 7 月期间在 Yenimahalle 家庭健康中心就诊的 298 名年龄≥65 岁的患者。使用 CFS 评估虚弱。药物治疗方案≥5 种定义为药物治疗方案≥5 种,药物治疗方案≥10 种定义为过度药物治疗方案。药物治疗方案<5 种归为“无药物治疗方案”。

结果

年龄组、性别、吸烟状况、婚姻状况、药物治疗方案和 FS 之间存在统计学差异(.003 和 η:.20; .001 和 Cohen d:.80; .018 和 Cohen d:.35; .001 和 Cohen d: 1.10 和 .001 和 η: 1.45)。药物治疗方案与虚弱评分之间存在强正相关。

结论

药物治疗方案,尤其是过度药物治疗方案,可能是识别健康状况更有可能恶化的老年患者的一个有前途的补充方法。初级保健提供者在开处方时也应考虑虚弱情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验