Suppr超能文献

概念工程的“概念”是哪种概念?

Which Concept of Concept for Conceptual Engineering?

作者信息

Isaac Manuel Gustavo

机构信息

Arché Philosophical Research Centre, University of St Andrews, 17-19 College Street, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9AL Scotland.

出版信息

Erkenntnis. 2023;88(5):2145-2169. doi: 10.1007/s10670-021-00447-0. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

Abstract

Conceptual engineering is the method for assessing and improving our concepts. However, little has been written about how best to conceive of concepts for the purposes of conceptual engineering. In this paper, I aim to fill this foundational gap, proceeding in three main steps: First, I propose a methodological framework for evaluating the conduciveness of a given concept of concept for conceptual engineering. Then, I develop a typology that contrasts two competing concepts of concept that can be used in conceptual engineering-namely, the philosophical and psychological ones. Finally, I evaluate these two concepts of concept using the proposed methodological framework and I show that, when it comes to making conceptual engineering an actionable method, the psychological concept of concept outclasses its philosophical counterpart on all counts. This provides a baseline from which the concept of concept can be further improved for the purposes of conceptual engineering.

摘要

概念工程是评估和改进我们概念的方法。然而,关于如何为概念工程的目的而最好地构思概念,却鲜有著述。在本文中,我旨在填补这一基础空白,分三个主要步骤进行:首先,我提出一个方法框架,用于评估给定的概念概念对概念工程的适用性。然后,我构建了一种类型学,对比了可用于概念工程的两种相互竞争的概念概念,即哲学概念和心理学概念。最后,我使用所提出的方法框架评估这两种概念概念,结果表明,在使概念工程成为一种可操作的方法方面,心理学概念概念在各方面都优于其哲学对应概念。这提供了一个基线,据此可进一步改进概念工程目的下的概念概念。

相似文献

1
Which Concept of Concept for Conceptual Engineering?
Erkenntnis. 2023;88(5):2145-2169. doi: 10.1007/s10670-021-00447-0. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
2
What Should Conceptual Engineering Be All About?
Philosophia (Ramat Gan). 2021;49(5):2053-2065. doi: 10.1007/s11406-021-00367-x. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3
Concept Appraisal.
Cogn Sci. 2021 May;45(5):e12978. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12978.
5
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
6
ADAPTS: An Intelligent Sustainable Conceptual Framework for Engineering Projects.
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 11;20(6):1553. doi: 10.3390/s20061553.
7
A Concept Analysis of Conceptual Learning: A Guide for Educators.
J Nurs Educ. 2019 Jan 1;58(1):7-15. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20190103-03.
8
Conjunctional Concepts: The Conceptual Teaching Technique in Biology Classes.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2021 Sep 30;22(3). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00168-21. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
A framework for design optimization across multiple concepts.
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 3;14(1):7858. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57468-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptual Spaces for Conceptual Engineering? Feminism as a Case Study.
Rev Philos Psychol. 2025;16(1):199-229. doi: 10.1007/s13164-023-00708-7. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
2
Salient semantics.
Synthese. 2024;204(2):39. doi: 10.1007/s11229-024-04669-x. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
What Should Conceptual Engineering Be All About?
Philosophia (Ramat Gan). 2021;49(5):2053-2065. doi: 10.1007/s11406-021-00367-x. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
2
Concept Appraisal.
Cogn Sci. 2021 May;45(5):e12978. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12978.
3
Concept-metacognition.
Mind Lang. 2020 Nov;35(5):565-582. doi: 10.1111/mila.12235. Epub 2019 May 1.
4
X-Phi and Carnapian Explication.
Erkenntnis. 2015 Apr 1;80(2):381-402. doi: 10.1007/s10670-014-9648-3.
5
Concepts versus conceptions (again).
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):221-2. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000440.
6
Concepts and theoretical unification.
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):219-20. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000427.
7
Concepts are a functional kind.
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):217-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000403.
8
Précis of doing without concepts.
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):195-206; discussion 206-44. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09991531.
9
Concepts and stereotypes.
Cognition. 1983 Dec;15(1-3):237-62. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90044-6.
10
Concepts and conceptual structure.
Am Psychol. 1989 Dec;44(12):1469-81. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.44.12.1469.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验