Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Better Health Programme South Africa, Mott MacDonald, Cape Town, South Africa.
Nutr Rev. 2024 Feb 12;82(3):332-360. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad059.
Globally, 1 in 3 children under 5 years is undernourished or overweight, and 1 in 2 suffers from hidden hunger due to nutrient deficiencies. As children spend a considerable time at school, school-based policies that aim to improve children's dietary intake may help address this double burden of malnutrition.
This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of implementing policies or interventions that influence the school food environment on children's health and nonhealth outcomes.
DATA SOURCES, EXTRACTION, AND ANALYSIS: Eleven databases were searched up to April 2020 and the World Health Organization (WHO) released a call for data due in June 2020. Records were screened against the eligibility criteria, and data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were conducted by 1 reviewer and checked by another. The synthesis was based on effect direction, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.
Seventy-four studies reporting 10 different comparisons were included. The body of evidence indicates that interventions addressing the school food environment may have modest beneficial effects on certain key outcomes. Nutrition standards for healthy foods and beverages at schools, interventions that change how food is presented and positioned, and fruit and vegetable provision may have a beneficial effect on the consumption of healthy foods and beverages. Regarding effects on the consumption of discretionary foods and beverages, nutrition standards may have beneficial effects. Nutrition standards for foods and beverages, changes to portion size served, and the implementation of multiple nudging strategies may have beneficial effects on energy intake. Regarding effects of purchasing or selecting healthier foods, changes to how food is presented and positioned may be beneficial. This review was commissioned and supported by the WHO (registration 2020/1001698-0). WHO reviewed and approved the protocol for the systematic review and reviewed the initial report of the completed systematic review.
PROSPERO registration no: CRD42020186265.
在全球范围内,每三个五岁以下儿童中就有一个存在营养不良或超重问题,每两个儿童中就有一个因营养缺乏而遭受隐性饥饿。由于儿童在学校度过了相当多的时间,因此旨在改善儿童饮食摄入的基于学校的政策可能有助于解决这双重营养不良问题。
本系统评价旨在评估影响学校食物环境的政策或干预措施对儿童健康和非健康结果的影响。
数据来源、提取和分析:截至 2020 年 4 月,11 个数据库被搜索,世界卫生组织(WHO)于 2020 年 6 月发布了数据征集通知。记录与入选标准进行了筛选,由 1 名审查员进行数据提取和风险偏倚评估,另一名审查员进行核对。综合分析基于效果方向,使用 GRADE(推荐评估、制定和评估分级)方法评估证据的确定性。
纳入了 74 项研究报告的 10 项不同比较。证据表明,针对学校食物环境的干预措施可能对某些关键结果产生适度的有益影响。学校健康食品和饮料的营养标准、改变食品呈现和定位的干预措施,以及水果和蔬菜的供应可能对健康食品和饮料的消费产生有益影响。关于对随意性食品和饮料消费的影响,营养标准可能具有有益的效果。食品和饮料的营养标准、供应份量的改变以及多种提示策略的实施可能对能量摄入产生有益的影响。关于购买或选择更健康食品的效果,改变食品呈现和定位的方式可能是有益的。本综述由世界卫生组织委托和支持(注册号 2020/1001698-0)。世界卫生组织审查并批准了系统评价的方案,并审查了完成的系统评价的初步报告。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020186265。