School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Department of Medical Education, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
BMC Geriatr. 2023 May 31;23(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04024-8.
This study aimed to explore the association between adherence of collaborative care model and short-term deterioration of BPSD after controlling patient and caregiver factors.
This retrospective case-control study enrolled 276 participants who were newly diagnosed with dementia and BPSD. A dementia collaborative care team interviewed patients and caregivers to form a care plan and provided individualized education or social resource referrals. A multivariate logistic regression model with backward selection was used to test factors associated with BPSD deterioration, defined as worse neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI) scores 1 year after joining the care model.
Male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25-0.84) and higher clinical dementia rating scale sum of boxes scores (CDR-SOB) (OR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.83-0.98) were protective factors, whereas spouse caregivers and withdrawals from the care model (OR = 3.42; 95% CI = 1.28-9.15) were risk factors for BPSD deterioration.
Our study showed that both patient and caregiver factors were associated with deterioration of BPSD. The case manager-centered dementia collaborative care model is beneficial for the management of BPSD. Healthcare systems may consider implementing a case management model in clinical dementia care practice.
本研究旨在探讨在控制患者和照护者因素的情况下,协作式护理模式的依从性与 BPSD 短期恶化之间的关系。
本回顾性病例对照研究纳入了 276 名新诊断为痴呆症和 BPSD 的患者。痴呆症协作护理团队对患者和照护者进行访谈,制定护理计划,并提供个性化教育或社会资源转介。采用向后选择的多变量逻辑回归模型来检验与 BPSD 恶化相关的因素,定义为加入护理模式 1 年后神经精神问卷(NPI)评分更差。
男性(比值比 [OR] = 0.45;95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.25-0.84)和更高的临床痴呆评定量表总和评分(CDR-SOB)(OR = 0.90;95% CI = 0.83-0.98)是保护因素,而配偶照护者和退出护理模式(OR = 3.42;95% CI = 1.28-9.15)是 BPSD 恶化的风险因素。
我们的研究表明,患者和照护者因素均与 BPSD 的恶化相关。以病例经理为中心的痴呆协作护理模式有利于 BPSD 的管理。医疗保健系统可能需要考虑在临床痴呆护理实践中实施病例管理模式。