我们应如何认识同行评审者的重要作用？
How Should We Recognize the Important Role of the Peer Reviewer?
作者信息
Baskwill Amanda
机构信息
Loyalist College, Belleville, ON.
出版信息
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2023 Jun 1;16(2):1-3. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v16i2.849. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Abstract
Peer reviewers are instrumental to the publication of high-quality scholarly manuscripts. However, there are challenges within current models, including how best to recognize (and reward) reviewers for their contribution. The Editorial Team is committed to enhancing the peer-review process in 2023 and invites colleagues to become reviewers.
摘要
同行评审对于高质量学术手稿的发表至关重要。然而，当前模式存在一些挑战，包括如何以最佳方式认可（并奖励）评审人员的贡献。编辑团队致力于在2023年加强同行评审流程，并邀请各位同事成为评审人员。
相似文献
1
How Should We Recognize the Important Role of the Peer Reviewer?
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2023 Jun 1;16(2):1-3. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v16i2.849. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Celebrating the 10th Anniversary of the International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork.
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2018 Aug 5;11(3):1-3. eCollection 2018 Aug.
3
Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 29;5(9):e008707. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008707.
4
Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 8;5(4):e10072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010072.
5
Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts.
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):229-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.229.
6
Variability of Reviewers' Comments in the Peer Review Process for Orthopaedic Research.
Spine Deform. 2016 Jul;4(4):268-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
7
Shared burden is always lighter - Peer-review performance in an ophthalmological journal 2010-2020.
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;100(5):559-563. doi: 10.1111/aos.15033. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
8
[The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
Recenti Prog Med. 2017 Sep;108(9):355-359. doi: 10.1701/2745.27985.
9
Is expert peer review obsolete? A model suggests that post-publication reader review may exceed the accuracy of traditional peer review.
Surg Endosc. 2012 Aug;26(8):2275-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2171-1. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
10
Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
Ethiop Med J. 2013 Apr;51(2):95-103.
本文引用的文献
1
Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals.
Sci Technol Human Values. 2022 Jul;47(4):670-697. doi: 10.1177/01622439211068798. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
2
The impact of double-blind peer review on gender bias in scientific publishing: a systematic review.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;227(1):43-50.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.030. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Jan;23(1):4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
Zotero 插件