Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;51(8):2110-2119. doi: 10.1177/03635465231175160. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
Exercises that provide progressive therapeutic loading are a central component of patellofemoral pain rehabilitation, but quantitative evidence on patellofemoral joint loading is scarce for a majority of common weightbearing rehabilitation exercises.
To define a loading index to quantify, compare, rank, and categorize overall loading levels in the patellofemoral joint across 35 types of weightbearing rehabilitation exercises and activities of daily living.
Descriptive laboratory study.
Model-estimated knee flexion angles and extension moments based on motion capture and ground-reaction force data were used to quantify patellofemoral joint loading in 20 healthy participants who performed each exercise. A loading index was computed via a weighted sum of loading peak and cumulative loading impulse for each exercise. The 35 rehabilitation exercises and daily living activities were then ranked and categorized into low, moderate, and high "loading tiers" according to the loading index.
Overall patellofemoral loading levels varied substantially across the exercises and activities, with loading peak ranging from 0.6 times body weight during walking to 8.2 times body weight during single-leg decline squat. Most rehabilitation exercises generated a moderate level of patellofemoral joint loading. Few weightbearing exercises provided low-level loading that resembled walking or high-level loading with both high magnitude and duration. Exercises with high knee flexion tended to generate higher patellofemoral joint loading compared with high-intensity exercises.
This study quantified patellofemoral joint loading across a large collection of weightbearing exercises in the same cohort.
The visualized loading index ranks and modifiable worksheet may assist clinicians in planning patient-specific exercise programs for patellofemoral pain rehabilitation.
提供渐进式治疗负荷的运动是髌股疼痛康复的核心组成部分,但对于大多数常见的负重康复运动,髌股关节的负荷定量证据仍然缺乏。
定义一个负荷指数,以量化、比较、排名和分类 35 种负重康复运动和日常生活活动中髌股关节的整体负荷水平。
描述性实验室研究。
使用基于运动捕捉和地面反力数据的模型估计膝关节屈曲角度和伸展力矩,对 20 名健康参与者进行了每种运动的测试,以量化髌股关节的负荷。通过对每个运动的负荷峰值和累积负荷脉冲进行加权求和,计算出一个负荷指数。然后,根据负荷指数将 35 种康复运动和日常生活活动分为低、中、高“负荷等级”。
总体而言,各运动之间髌股关节的负荷水平差异很大,负荷峰值从步行时的 0.6 倍体重到单腿下降蹲时的 8.2 倍体重不等。大多数康复运动产生中等水平的髌股关节负荷。很少有负重运动提供类似于步行的低水平负荷或具有高幅度和高时长的高水平负荷。高膝关节屈曲的运动比高强度运动产生更高的髌股关节负荷。
本研究在同一队列中对大量负重运动进行了髌股关节负荷的量化。
可视化的负荷指数排名和可修改的工作表可能有助于临床医生为髌股疼痛康复制定个体化的运动方案。