• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Primary admission to a surgical service facilitates early cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis but does not influence patient outcome.初次入住外科病房有助于急性胆囊炎患者早期行胆囊切除术,但不影响患者预后。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jun 5;408(1):225. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02957-7.
2
Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in aged acute calculous cholecystitis: a cohort study.老年急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术与延期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2994-3001. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07091-4. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
3
Timing of cholecystectomy as the therapy for acute calculous cholecystitis.作为急性结石性胆囊炎治疗手段的胆囊切除术时机
Rozhl Chir. 2019 Winter;98(12):492-496. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2019.98.12.492-496.
4
Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of gangrenous cholecystitis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术在坏疽性胆囊炎治疗中的作用
Am J Surg. 2001 Jan;181(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00525-0.
5
The optimal treatment of patients with mild and moderate acute cholecystitis: time for a revision of the Tokyo Guidelines.轻度和中度急性胆囊炎患者的最佳治疗方法:是时候修订东京指南了。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3858-3863. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5412-x. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
6
[Laparoscopy or laparotomy in acute cholecystitis (200 cases). Comparison of the results and factors predictive of conversion].[急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜手术或开腹手术(200例)。结果比较及中转开腹的预测因素]
Chirurgie. 1999 Nov;124(5):529-35. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4001(00)88276-8.
7
Acute cholecystitis in elderly patients: A case for early cholecystectomy.老年患者的急性胆囊炎:早期胆囊切除术的实例
J Visc Surg. 2018 Apr;155(2):99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
8
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a retrospective study assessing risk factors for conversion and complications.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎:一项评估中转开腹及并发症危险因素的回顾性研究
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Nov 16;11:54. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0111-4. eCollection 2016.
9
Days of symptoms and days of hospital admission before surgery do not influence the results of cholecystectomy in moderate acute calculous cholecystitis-Cholecystectomy remains the best treatment.在中度急性结石性胆囊炎中,症状持续时间和住院时间术前并不会影响胆囊切除术的结果-胆囊切除术仍然是最佳治疗方法。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2022 Apr;114(4):213-218. doi: 10.17235/reed.2020.7405/2020.
10
Comparison of Emergency Cholecystectomy with Delayed Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage in Patients with Moderate Acute Cholecystitis.中度急性胆囊炎患者经皮经肝胆管胆囊引流术后急诊胆囊切除术与延期胆囊切除术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jun;28(6):705-712. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0502. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
World Society of Emergency Surgery-American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Guidelines for management of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in surgical patients: An executive summary.世界急诊外科学会-美国创伤外科学会手术患者艰难梭菌(梭状芽孢杆菌)感染管理指南:执行摘要。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Aug 1;91(2):422-426. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003196.
2
Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.急性结石性胆囊炎早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术时机的荟萃分析:随机临床试验研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Mar 25;16(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00360-5.
3
Comparison of indocyanine green dye fluorescent cholangiography with intra-operative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中吲哚菁绿荧光胆管造影与术中胆管造影的比较:荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1511-1520. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08164-5. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
4
Days of symptoms and days of hospital admission before surgery do not influence the results of cholecystectomy in moderate acute calculous cholecystitis-Cholecystectomy remains the best treatment.在中度急性结石性胆囊炎中,症状持续时间和住院时间术前并不会影响胆囊切除术的结果-胆囊切除术仍然是最佳治疗方法。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2022 Apr;114(4):213-218. doi: 10.17235/reed.2020.7405/2020.
5
2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis.2020 年世界急诊外科学会更新了急性结石性胆囊炎的诊断和治疗指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Nov 5;15(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00336-x.
6
Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: comparison of reconstituting and fenestrating techniques.腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术:重建技术与开窗技术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1014-1024. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08096-0. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
7
Does early surgery imply a critical risk for patients with Grade III acute cholecystitis?急性胆囊炎 III 级患者早期手术是否存在临界风险?
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jan;14(1):7-13. doi: 10.1111/ases.12799. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
8
Patients with acute cholecystitis should be admitted to a surgical service.患有急性胆囊炎的患者应被收治到外科病房。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Oct;87(4):870-875. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002415.
9
[Updated S3-Guideline for Prophylaxis, Diagnosis and Treatment of Gallstones. German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS) and German Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (DGAV) - AWMF Registry 021/008].[胆结石预防、诊断与治疗的更新S3指南。德国消化和代谢疾病学会(DGVS)及德国消化道外科学会(DGAV)——AWMF注册编号021/008]
Z Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug;56(8):912-966. doi: 10.1055/a-0644-2972. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
10
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis.东京指南 2018:急性胆囊炎管理流程图。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):55-72. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.516. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

初次入住外科病房有助于急性胆囊炎患者早期行胆囊切除术,但不影响患者预后。

Primary admission to a surgical service facilitates early cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis but does not influence patient outcome.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jun 5;408(1):225. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02957-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-023-02957-7
PMID:37273036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10241672/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Early cholecystectomy is recommended for acute calculous cholecystitis to reduce complications and lower health care costs. However, not all patients admitted to emergency services due to acute calculous cholecystitis are considered for surgery immediately. Our intention was therefore to evaluate patient management and outcome parameters following cholecystectomy depending on the type of emergency service patients are primarily admitted to.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients that were treated for acute cholecystitis at our hospital between 2014 and 2021. Only patients that underwent surgical treatment for acute calculous cholecystitis were included. Patients with cholecystectomies that were performed due to other medical conditions were not incorporated. Primary outcomes were the perioperative length of stay and postoperative complications. Perioperative antimicrobial management and disease deterioration according to Tokyo Guidelines from 2018 due to inhouse organization were assessed as secondary outcome parameters.

RESULTS

Of 512 patients included in our final analysis, 334 patients were primarily admitted to a surgical emergency service (SAG) whereas 178 were initially treated in a medical service (MAG). The latency between admission and cholecystectomy was significantly prolonged in the MAG with a median time to surgery of 2 days (Q25 1, Q75 3.25, IQR 2.25) compared to the SAG with a median time to surgery of 1 day (Q25 1, Q75 2, IQR 1) (p < 0.001). The duration of surgery was comparable between both groups. Necrotizing cholecystitis (27.2% vs. 38.8%, p = 0.007) and pericholecystic abscess or gallbladder perforation (7.5% vs. 14.6% p = 0.010) were less frequently described in the SAG. In the SAG, 85.7% of CCEs were performed laparoscopically, 6.0% were converted to open, and 10.4% were performed as open surgery upfront. In the MAG, 80.9% were completed laparoscopically, while 7.2% were converted and 11.2% were performed via primary laparotomy (p = 0.743). Histologically gangrenous cholecystitis was confirmed in 38.0% of the specimen in the SAG compared to 47.8% in the MAG (p = 0.033). While the prolonged preoperative stay led to prolonged overall length of stay, the postoperative length of stay was similar at a median of 3 days in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, we present the largest single center cohort of acute calculous cholecystitis evaluating the perioperative management and outcome of patients admitted to either medical or surgical service prior to undergoing cholecystectomy. In patients that were primarily admitted to medical emergency services, we found disproportionately more gallbladder necrosis, perforation, and gangrene. Despite prolonged time intervals between admission and cholecystectomy in the MAG and advanced cases of cholecystitis, we did not record a prolonged procedure duration, conversion to open surgery, or complication rate. However, patients with acute calculous cholecystitis should either be primarily admitted to a surgical emergency service or at least a surgeon should be consulted at the time of diagnosis in order to avoid disease progression and unnecessary health care costs.

摘要

目的

为了降低并发症发生率和医疗保健成本,建议对急性结石性胆囊炎患者进行早期胆囊切除术。然而,并非所有因急性结石性胆囊炎而入住急诊服务的患者都立即考虑手术。因此,我们旨在评估根据患者最初入住的急诊服务类型,对行胆囊切除术的患者的治疗管理和结果参数。

方法

我们对 2014 年至 2021 年期间在我院接受急性胆囊炎治疗的所有患者进行了回顾性分析。仅纳入接受手术治疗的急性结石性胆囊炎患者。因其他医疗条件而行胆囊切除术的患者不纳入分析。主要结局是围手术期的住院时间和术后并发症。根据 2018 年东京指南,评估围手术期抗菌管理和由于院内组织问题导致的疾病恶化作为次要结局参数。

结果

在我们的最终分析中,512 名患者中,334 名患者最初被收入外科急救服务(SAG),而 178 名患者最初在医疗服务(MAG)中接受治疗。与外科急救服务组(中位手术时间为 1 天,Q25:1,Q75:2,IQR:1)相比,医疗急救服务组(中位手术时间为 2 天,Q25:1,Q75:3.25,IQR:2.25)的入院至胆囊切除术的时间明显延长(p < 0.001)。两组的手术时间相当。坏疽性胆囊炎(27.2%比 38.8%,p = 0.007)和胆囊周围脓肿或穿孔(7.5%比 14.6%,p = 0.010)在 SAG 中较少发生。在 SAG 中,85.7%的 CCE 经腹腔镜完成,6.0%转为开腹,10.4%直接开腹手术。在 MAG 中,80.9%的手术经腹腔镜完成,7.2%的患者中转开腹,11.2%的患者直接开腹(p = 0.743)。SAG 中 38.0%的标本病理证实为坏疽性胆囊炎,而 MAG 中为 47.8%(p = 0.033)。虽然术前住院时间延长导致总住院时间延长,但两组的术后住院时间相似,均为 3 天。

结论

据我们所知,这是评估在接受胆囊切除术之前被收入医疗或外科急救服务的患者围手术期管理和结果的最大单中心队列的急性结石性胆囊炎研究。在最初被收入医疗急救服务的患者中,我们发现胆囊坏死、穿孔和坏疽的比例不成比例地增加。尽管 MAG 中的入院和胆囊切除术之间的时间间隔延长,且胆囊炎的病情较严重,但我们并未记录手术时间延长、转为开腹手术或并发症发生率增加。然而,急性结石性胆囊炎患者应被收入外科急救服务,或者至少在诊断时应咨询外科医生,以避免疾病进展和不必要的医疗保健成本。