Chalitsios Christos V, Santoso Cornelia, Nartey Yvonne, Khan Nusrat, Simpson Glenn, Islam Nazrul, Stuart Beth, Farmer Andrew, Dambha-Miller Hajira
Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
medRxiv. 2023 May 19:2023.05.18.23290151. doi: 10.1101/2023.05.18.23290151.
To classify older adults with MLTC into clusters based on accumulating conditions as trajectories over time, characterise clusters and quantify associations between derived clusters and all-cause mortality.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) over nine years (n=15,091 aged 50 years and older). Group-based trajectory modelling was used to classify people into MLTC clusters based on accumulating conditions over time. Derived clusters were used to quantify the associations between MLTC trajectory memberships, sociodemographic characteristics, and all-cause mortality.
Five distinct clusters of MLTC trajectories were identified and characterised as: "no-LTC" (18.57%), "single-LTC" (31.21%), "evolving MLTC" (25.82%), "moderate MLTC" (17.12%), and "high MLTC" (7.27%). Increasing age was consistently associated with an increased number of MLTC. Female sex (aOR = 1.13; 95%CI 1.01 to 1.27) and ethnic minority (aOR = 2.04; 95%CI 1.40 to 3.00) were associated with the "moderate MLTC" and "high MLTC" clusters, respectively. Higher education and paid employment were associated with a lower likelihood of progression over time towards an increased number of MLTC. All the clusters had higher all-cause mortality than the "no-LTC" cluster.
The development of MLTC and the increase in the number of conditions over time follow distinct trajectories. These are determined by non-modifiable (age, sex, ethnicity) and modifiable factors (education and employment). Stratifying risk through clustering will enable practitioners to identify older adults with a higher likelihood of worsening MLTC over time to tailor effective interventions.
根据随时间累积的状况将患有多种慢性病(MLTC)的老年人分类为不同群组,描述群组特征,并量化衍生群组与全因死亡率之间的关联。
我们使用英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)进行了一项为期九年的回顾性队列研究(n = 15,091名年龄在50岁及以上)。基于群组的轨迹建模用于根据随时间累积的状况将人们分类为MLTC群组。衍生群组用于量化MLTC轨迹成员、社会人口学特征与全因死亡率之间的关联。
确定了五个不同的MLTC轨迹群组,其特征如下:“无长期护理”(18.57%)、“单一长期护理”(31.21%)、“不断发展的MLTC”(25.82%)、“中度MLTC”(17.12%)和“高度MLTC”(7.27%)。年龄增长始终与MLTC数量增加相关。女性(调整后比值比[aOR]=1.13;95%置信区间[CI]为1.01至1.27)和少数族裔(aOR = 2.04;95%CI为1.40至3.00)分别与“中度MLTC”和“高度MLTC”群组相关。高等教育和有偿就业与随着时间推移向MLTC数量增加发展的可能性较低相关。所有群组的全因死亡率均高于“无长期护理”群组。
MLTC的发展以及随时间状况数量的增加遵循不同的轨迹。这些轨迹由不可改变的因素(年龄、性别、种族)和可改变的因素(教育和就业)决定。通过聚类分层风险将使从业者能够识别出随着时间推移MLTC恶化可能性较高的老年人,以便制定有效的干预措施。