Institute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, Graz University, Graz A-8010, Austria; School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1C 5S7, Canada.
School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1C 5S7, Canada.
J Sport Health Sci. 2024 Mar;13(2):186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
It is well known that stretch training can induce prolonged increases in joint range of motion (ROM). However, to date more information is needed regarding which training variables might have greater influence on improvements in flexibility. Thus, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of stretch training on ROM in healthy participants by considering potential moderating variables, such as stretching technique, intensity, duration, frequency, and muscles stretched, as well as sex-specific, age-specific, and/or trained state-specific adaptations to stretch training.
We searched through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SportDiscus to find eligible studies and, finally, assessed the results from 77 studies and 186 effect sizes by applying a random-effect meta-analysis. Moreover, by applying a mixed-effect model, we performed the respective subgroup analyses. To find potential relationships between stretch duration or age and effect sizes, we performed a meta-regression.
We found a significant overall effect, indicating that stretch training can increase ROM with a moderate effect compared to the controls (effect size = -1.002; Z = -12.074; 95% confidence interval: -1.165 to -0.840; p < 0.001; I = 74.97). Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference between the stretching techniques (p = 0.01) indicating that proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and static stretching produced greater ROM than did ballistic/dynamic stretching. Moreover, there was a significant effect between the sexes (p = 0.04), indicating that females showed higher gains in ROM compared to males. However, further moderating analysis showed no significant relation or difference.
When the goal is to maximize ROM in the long term, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation or static stretching, rather than ballistic/dynamic stretching, should be applied. Something to consider in future research as well as sports practice is that neither volume, intensity, nor frequency of stretching were found to play a significant role in ROM yields.
众所周知,拉伸训练可以使关节活动范围(ROM)长时间增加。然而,目前需要更多信息来了解哪些训练变量可能对柔韧性的提高有更大的影响。因此,本荟萃分析的目的是通过考虑拉伸技术、强度、持续时间、频率和拉伸肌肉等潜在的调节变量,以及对拉伸训练的性别特异性、年龄特异性和/或训练状态特异性适应,来研究拉伸训练对健康参与者 ROM 的影响。
我们通过 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 SportDiscus 进行检索,以找到符合条件的研究,最后通过应用随机效应荟萃分析评估了 77 项研究和 186 个效应量的结果。此外,我们还通过应用混合效应模型进行了相应的亚组分析。为了发现拉伸持续时间或年龄与效应量之间的潜在关系,我们进行了元回归分析。
我们发现了一个显著的总体效应,表明与对照组相比,拉伸训练可以适度增加 ROM(效应量=-1.002;Z=-12.074;95%置信区间:-1.165 至-0.840;p<0.001;I=74.97)。亚组分析显示拉伸技术之间存在显著差异(p=0.01),表明本体感受神经肌肉促进法和静态拉伸比弹振/动态拉伸产生更大的 ROM。此外,性别之间也存在显著差异(p=0.04),表明女性比男性在 ROM 上的增益更高。然而,进一步的调节分析显示没有显著的关系或差异。
当目标是长期最大化 ROM 时,应该使用本体感受神经肌肉促进法或静态拉伸,而不是弹振/动态拉伸。这是未来研究和体育实践中需要考虑的一点,即拉伸的量、强度或频率都没有发现对 ROM 产生有显著作用。