Suppr超能文献

数字心理健康生物心理社会跨诊断干预措施联合或不联合治疗师辅助对成人焦虑和抑郁的疗效:适应性随机对照试验。

Efficacy of a Digital Mental Health Biopsychosocial Transdiagnostic Intervention With or Without Therapist Assistance for Adults With Anxiety and Depression: Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Health Innovation & Transformation Centre, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Australia.

Biopsychosocial & eHealth Research & Innovation, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 12;25:e45135. doi: 10.2196/45135.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital mental health (DMH) interventions incorporating elements that adapt to the evolving needs of consumers have the potential to further our understanding of the optimal intensity of therapist assistance and inform stepped-care models.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of a transdiagnostic biopsychosocial DMH program, with or without therapist assistance for adults with subthreshold symptoms or a diagnosis of anxiety or depression.

METHODS

In a randomized adaptive clinical trial design, all participants had access to the DMH program, with eligibility to have their program augmented with therapist assistance determined by program engagement or symptom severity. Participants who met stepped-care criteria were randomized to have their treatment program augmented with either low-intensity (10 min/week of video chat support for 7 weeks) or high-intensity (50 min/week of video chat support for 7 weeks) therapist assistance. A total of 103 participants (mean age 34.17, SD 10.50 years) were assessed before (week 0), during (weeks 3 and 6), and after the intervention (week 9) and at the 3-month follow-up (week 21). The effects of 3 treatment conditions (DMH program only, DMH program+low-intensity therapist assistance, and DMH program+high-intensity therapist assistance) on changes in the 2 primary outcomes of anxiety (7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale [GAD-7]) and depression (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) were assessed using the Cohen d, reliable change index, and mixed-effects linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

There were no substantial differences in the outcome measures among intervention conditions. However, there were significant time effect changes in most outcomes over time. All 3 intervention conditions demonstrated strong and significant treatment effect changes in GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores, with absolute Cohen d values ranging from 0.82 to 1.79 (all P<.05). The mixed-effects models revealed that, in the Life Flex program-only condition at week 3, mean GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores significantly decreased from baseline by 3.54 and 4.38 (all P<.001), respectively. At weeks 6, 9, and 21, GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores significantly decreased from baseline by at least 6 and 7 points (all P<.001), respectively. Nonresponders at week 3 who were stepped up to therapist assistance increased program engagement and treatment response. At the postintervention time point and 3-month follow-up, 67% (44/65) and 69% (34/49) of the participants, respectively, no longer met diagnostic criteria for anxiety or depression.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings highlight that early detection of low engagement and non-treatment response presents an opportunity to effectively intervene by incorporating an adaptive design. Although the study findings indicate that therapist assistance was no more effective than the DMH intervention program alone for reducing symptoms of anxiety or depression, the data highlight the potential influence of participant selection bias and participant preferences within stepped-care treatment models.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000422921; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=378317&isReview=true.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/45040.

摘要

背景

将适应消费者不断变化需求的元素纳入数字心理健康(DMH)干预措施中,有可能进一步了解治疗师协助的最佳强度,并为阶梯式护理模式提供信息。

目的

主要目的是比较一种跨诊断生物心理社会 DMH 计划的疗效,该计划是否为有阈下症状或焦虑或抑郁诊断的成年人提供治疗师协助。

方法

在随机自适应临床试验设计中,所有参与者都可以使用 DMH 计划,通过计划参与度或症状严重程度来确定是否可以增加其计划的治疗师协助。符合阶梯式护理标准的参与者被随机分配到接受低强度(每周 10 分钟视频聊天支持,持续 7 周)或高强度(每周 50 分钟视频聊天支持,持续 7 周)治疗师协助的治疗计划。共有 103 名参与者(平均年龄 34.17 岁,标准差 10.50 岁)在干预前(第 0 周)、期间(第 3 周和第 6 周)和干预后(第 9 周)以及 3 个月随访(第 21 周)进行评估。使用 Cohen d、可靠变化指数和混合效应线性回归分析评估 3 种治疗条件(仅 DMH 计划、DMH 计划+低强度治疗师协助和 DMH 计划+高强度治疗师协助)对焦虑(7 项广泛性焦虑障碍量表[GAD-7])和抑郁(9 项患者健康问卷[PHQ-9])2 个主要结局变化的影响。

结果

干预条件之间在结果测量上没有显著差异。然而,大多数结果在时间上都有显著的时间效应变化。所有 3 种干预条件均显示 GAD-7 和 PHQ-9 评分的治疗效果明显变化,绝对 Cohen d 值范围为 0.82 至 1.79(均 P<.05)。混合效应模型显示,在 Life Flex 计划单一组别中,第 3 周时 GAD-7 和 PHQ-9 评分分别较基线显著下降 3.54 和 4.38(均 P<.001)。在第 6、9 和 21 周时,GAD-7 和 PHQ-9 评分分别较基线至少下降了 6 分和 7 分(均 P<.001)。第 3 周无反应的非应答者增加了对治疗的参与度和反应。在干预后时间点和 3 个月随访时,分别有 67%(44/65)和 69%(34/49)的参与者不再符合焦虑或抑郁的诊断标准。

结论

研究结果表明,早期发现低参与度和非治疗反应为通过采用适应性设计进行有效干预提供了机会。尽管研究结果表明,与单独使用 DMH 干预计划相比,治疗师协助对减轻焦虑或抑郁症状没有更有效,但数据突出了参与者选择偏差和阶梯式护理治疗模式中参与者偏好的潜在影响。

试验注册

澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册 ACTRN12620000422921;https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=378317&isReview=true。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):RR2-10.2196/45040。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db94/10337336/f965da2d2fff/jmir_v25i1e45135_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验