Suppr超能文献

让卫生专业人员参与制定质量和安全仪表板:定性研究。

Involving Health Professionals in the Development of Quality and Safety Dashboards: Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Department of Quality, Safety and Quality Improvement, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 12;25:e42649. doi: 10.2196/42649.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dashboards are an important tool for hospitals to improve quality and safety performance. However, implementing quality and safety dashboards often does not increase performance due to a lack of use by health professionals. Including health professionals in the development process of quality and safety dashboards can improve their use in practice. Yet, it remains unclear how a development process involving health professionals can be executed successfully.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is twofold: (1) to delineate how a process whereby health professionals are included in the development of quality and safety dashboards can be facilitated and (2) to identify the factors that are important to consider in order to make that process successful.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative, in-depth exploratory case study in which we analyzed 150 pages of internal documents and interviewed 13 staff members regarding the development of quality and safety dashboards within 2 care pathways of a hospital that has experience in such development. The data were analyzed inductively using the constant comparative method.

RESULTS

We found that the development of quality and safety dashboards in collaboration with health professionals was facilitated through a five-stage process: (1) familiarizing participants with dashboards and the development process; (2) brainstorming about potential indicators to be included in the dashboard; (3) prioritizing, defining, and selecting indicators to be included in the dashboard; (4) examining how the indicators can be visualized; and (5) implementing the dashboard and following up on its use. To enhance the success of the process, 3 factors were deemed important. The first is to create and maintain broad involvement, ensuring that various professions are represented and take ownership of the dashboard. Here, potential barriers include gaining engagement from peers not directly involved in the process and maintaining involvement after the initial implementation of the dashboard. Second, unburdening, whereby quality and safety staff facilitate a structured process that has little additional burden for professionals. For this, time management and a lack of collaboration with departments responsible for delivering the data might be an issue. Lastly, focusing on relevance for health professionals, which refers to the inclusion of indicators with value for health professionals. For this factor, a lack of consensus on how indicators should be defined and registered might be a barrier.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care organizations seeking to develop quality and safety dashboards in collaboration with health professionals can use a 5-stage process. To enhance the success of the process, organizations are advised to focus on 3 key factors. For each of the key factors, potential barriers should be taken into account. Engaging in this process and attaining the key factors could increase the likelihood that the dashboards are used in practice.

摘要

背景

仪表盘是医院提高质量和安全绩效的重要工具。然而,由于卫生专业人员缺乏使用,实施质量和安全仪表盘往往不会提高绩效。让卫生专业人员参与质量和安全仪表盘的开发过程可以提高其在实践中的使用。然而,目前尚不清楚如何成功实施一个涉及卫生专业人员的开发过程。

目的

本研究旨在双重目的:(1)阐明如何促进卫生专业人员参与质量和安全仪表盘开发的过程,以及(2)确定在该过程中成功实施需要考虑的重要因素。

方法

我们进行了一项定性、深入的探索性案例研究,分析了一家在开发此类仪表盘方面有经验的医院的 2 条护理路径中,13 名工作人员关于开发质量和安全仪表盘的 150 页内部文件,并进行了访谈。使用常数比较法对数据进行了归纳分析。

结果

我们发现,通过一个五阶段的过程与卫生专业人员合作开发质量和安全仪表盘可以得到促进:(1)使参与者熟悉仪表盘和开发过程;(2)头脑风暴要包含在仪表盘内的潜在指标;(3)对要包含在仪表盘内的指标进行优先级排序、定义和选择;(4)检查如何可视化指标;以及(5)实施仪表盘并跟进其使用情况。为了提高过程的成功率,有 3 个因素被认为很重要。首先是创造和维持广泛的参与度,确保各种专业都有代表并对仪表盘拥有所有权。在这里,潜在的障碍包括从没有直接参与该过程的同事那里获得参与度,并在仪表盘的初始实施后保持参与度。其次,是减轻负担,即质量和安全人员促进一个对专业人员负担不大的结构化过程。在这方面,时间管理和与负责提供数据的部门缺乏合作可能是一个问题。最后,关注卫生专业人员的相关性,即包含对卫生专业人员有价值的指标。对于这一因素,如何定义和注册指标的共识可能是一个障碍。

结论

寻求与卫生专业人员合作开发质量和安全仪表盘的医疗保健组织可以使用一个五阶段的过程。为了提高过程的成功率,组织应关注 3 个关键因素。对于每个关键因素,都应考虑潜在的障碍。参与这一过程并实现关键因素可以增加仪表盘在实践中被使用的可能性。

相似文献

2
Developing a hospital-wide quality and safety dashboard: a qualitative research study.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Dec;27(12):1000-1007. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007784. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Dashboards in Health Care Settings: Protocol for a Scoping Review.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 2;11(3):e34894. doi: 10.2196/34894.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Insights from staff nurses and managers on unit-specific nursing performance dashboards: a qualitative study.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Dec;23(12):1001-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002595. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
10
Emergency Department Quality Dashboard; a Systematic Review of Performance Indicators, Functionalities, and Challenges.
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 17;9(1):e47. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1230. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

2
A human centered design approach to define and measure documentation quality using an EHR virtual simulation.
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 19;19(8):e0308992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308992. eCollection 2024.
3
Development and usability of an EHR-driven hypertension disparities dashboard in primary care: A qualitative study.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024 Jul;26(7):797-805. doi: 10.1111/jch.14834. Epub 2024 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

2
Conceptualizing the digitalization of healthcare work: A metaphor-based Critical Interpretive Synthesis.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114572. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114572. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
3
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
4
Requirements for a Dashboard to Support Quality Improvement Teams in Pain Management.
Front Big Data. 2021 May 14;4:654914. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2021.654914. eCollection 2021.
5
Persistent institutional breaches: Technology use in healthcare work.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;289:114399. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114399. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
6
Electronic Medical Records implementation in hospital: An empirical investigation of individual and organizational determinants.
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 4;15(6):e0234108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234108. eCollection 2020.
7
Two Decades Since To Err Is Human: An Assessment Of Progress And Emerging Priorities In Patient Safety.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1736-1743. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0738.
8
Building of profound knowledge.
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2018 Aug;48(8):196-197. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
9
Developing a hospital-wide quality and safety dashboard: a qualitative research study.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Dec;27(12):1000-1007. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007784. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验