Hagen Tineke, De Caluwé Elien, Bogaerts Stefan
Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Development Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Development Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2023 Jul-Aug;89:101902. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101902. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
The central question of this study is whether buffering, boosting and exacerbating effects of the Big Five personality factors extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness and neuroticism can be demonstrated in the relationship between two job demands (i.e., work pressure and working overtime) and both burnout and work engagement in 257 Dutch judges. It is important to better understand the interaction effects between various job demands (work pressure and working overtime) and personality on both burnout and work engagement in judges given their increased risk of burnout and lower work engagement due to cognitively and their emotionally demanding work. Three hypotheses were tested in a cross-sectional design study. Moderation analyses showed that, as expected, conscientiousness significantly boosted the relationship between working overtime and work engagement. Hence, high scorers on conscientiousness showed more work engagement when working overtime. Also, extraversion moderated the relation between working overtime and work engagement, but only at a low level of extraversion. Thus, contrary to expectations, introverts showed more work engagement when they work overtime. Also, significant main effects were found. Work pressure and neuroticism related positively to burnout, while extraversion and agreeableness related negatively to burnout. Moreover, extraversion, agreeableness and conscientiousness related positively to work engagement. In our study, conscientiousness, extraversion and agreeableness can be considered as personal resources for judges, in line with the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory. Especially conscientiousness can facilitate judges to cope with challenging working circumstances and introversion ensures that judges stay engaged despite working overtime.
本研究的核心问题是,在257名荷兰法官中,外向性、经验开放性、宜人性、尽责性和神经质这五大人格因素的缓冲、促进和加剧效应,是否能在两种工作需求(即工作压力和加班)与倦怠和工作投入之间的关系中得到体现。鉴于法官的工作对认知和情感要求较高,他们面临更高的倦怠风险和更低的工作投入,因此更好地理解各种工作需求(工作压力和加班)与人格之间对法官倦怠和工作投入的交互作用非常重要。在一项横断面设计研究中检验了三个假设。调节分析表明,正如预期的那样,尽责性显著促进了加班与工作投入之间的关系。因此,尽责性得分高的人在加班时表现出更高的工作投入。此外,外向性调节了加班与工作投入之间的关系,但仅在外向性水平较低时。因此,与预期相反,内向者在加班时表现出更高的工作投入。同时,也发现了显著的主效应。工作压力和神经质与倦怠呈正相关,而外向性和宜人性与倦怠呈负相关。此外,外向性、宜人性和尽责性与工作投入呈正相关。在我们的研究中,尽责性、外向性和宜人性可被视为法官的个人资源,这与资源保存(COR)理论一致。特别是尽责性可以帮助法官应对具有挑战性的工作环境,而内向性确保法官即使在加班时也能保持投入。