Adumala Aruna, Palat Gayatri, Vajjala Archana, Brun Eva, Segerlantz Mikael
Department of Pain and Palliative Medicine, MNJ Institute of Oncology and RCC, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Pain Relief and Palliative Care Society, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Indian J Palliat Care. 2023 Apr-Jun;29(2):200-206. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_58_2022. Epub 2023 May 30.
In India, cervical cancer is the most common cancer among women and makes up for up to 29% of all registered cancer in females. Cancer-related pain is one of the major distressing symptoms for all cancer patients. Pain is characterised as somatic or neuropathic, and the total pain experience is often mixed. Conventional opioids are the backbone of analgesic treatment but are most often not sufficient in alleviating neuropathic pain, common in cervical cancer. Accumulating evidence of the advantage of methadone compared to conventional opioids, due to agonist action at both μ and q opioid receptors, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist activity and the ability to inhibit the reuptake of monoamines has been demonstrated. We hypothesised that, with these properties', methadone might be a good option for the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with cervical cancer.
Patients with cervical cancer stages ll-lll were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. A comparison was made between methadone versus immediate release morphine (IR morphine), with increasing doses until pain was controlled. Inclusion-period was from October 3 to December 31 2020, and the total patient-study period was 12 weeks. Pain intensity was assessed according to the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Douleur Neuropathique (DN4). The primary objective was to determine whether methadone was clinically superior versus noninferior to morphine as an analgesic for the treatment of cancer related neuropathic pain in women with cervical cancer.
A total of 85 women were included; five withdrew and six died during the study period, leaving 74 patients completing the study. All participants showed a reduction in mean values of NRS and DN4 from the time of inclusion and to the end of the study period, for IR morphine and methadone 8.4-2.7 and 8.6-1.5, respectively ( < 0.001). The DN4 score mean reduction for Morphine and Methadone were 6.12-1.37 and 6.05-0, respectively ( < 0.001). Side effects were more common in the group of patients receiving IR morphine compared to the patients treated with methadone.
We found that Methadone had a superior analgesic effect with good overall tolerability compared with morphine as a first-line strong opioid for the management of cancer-related neuropathic pain.
在印度,宫颈癌是女性中最常见的癌症,占所有登记女性癌症的29%。癌症相关疼痛是所有癌症患者的主要痛苦症状之一。疼痛分为躯体性或神经性,总的疼痛体验往往是混合性的。传统阿片类药物是镇痛治疗的基础,但在缓解宫颈癌常见的神经性疼痛方面往往不够有效。越来越多的证据表明,由于美沙酮对μ和κ阿片受体均有激动作用、具有N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)拮抗剂活性以及抑制单胺再摄取的能力,与传统阿片类药物相比具有优势。我们假设,基于这些特性,美沙酮可能是治疗宫颈癌患者神经性疼痛的一个好选择。
宫颈癌II-III期患者被纳入这项随机对照试验。对美沙酮与即释吗啡(IR吗啡)进行比较,逐渐增加剂量直至疼痛得到控制。纳入期为2020年10月3日至12月31日,患者总研究期为12周。根据数字评分量表(NRS)和神经病理性疼痛量表(DN4)评估疼痛强度。主要目的是确定美沙酮作为镇痛药治疗宫颈癌女性癌症相关神经性疼痛在临床上是否优于或不劣于吗啡。
总共纳入85名女性;在研究期间,5人退出,6人死亡,74名患者完成研究。所有参与者从纳入时到研究期末,NRS和DN4的平均值均有所降低,即释吗啡组和美沙酮组分别从8.4降至2.7和从8.6降至1.5(P<0.001)。吗啡组和美沙酮组DN4评分的平均降低值分别为从6.12降至1.37和从6.05降至0(P<0.001)。与接受美沙酮治疗的患者相比,接受即释吗啡治疗的患者组副作用更常见。
我们发现,作为治疗癌症相关神经性疼痛的一线强效阿片类药物,美沙酮与吗啡相比具有更好的镇痛效果和总体耐受性。