Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
PeerJ. 2023 Jun 13;11:e15504. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15504. eCollection 2023.
To explore the impact of sports on aggression in children and adolescents and analyze whether different conditions in the intervention, such as type of sports, or intervention duration, have different influences on the effect of interventions.
The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022361024). We performed a systematic search of Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Embase and Scopus databases from database inception to 12 October 2022 for all studies written in English. Studies were included if they met the following PICO criteria. All analyses were carried out using the Review Manager 5.3 Software. We summarized aggression, hostility and anger scores using SMDs. Summary estimates with 95% confidence intervals were pooled using DerSimonian-Laird random effects model or fixed effects model according to between-study heterogeneity.
A total of 15 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in this review. The overall mean effect size indicated that sport interventions was associated with lower aggression (SMD = -0.37, 95% CI [-0.69 to -0.06], = 0.020; = 88%). Subgroup analyses showed that non-contact sports were associated with lower aggression (SMD = -0.65, 95% CI [-1.17 to -0.13], = 0.020; = 92%) but high-contact sports were not (SMD = -0.15, 95% CI [-0.55 to 0.25], = 0.470; = 79%). In addition, when intervention duration <6 months, sport interventions was associated with lower aggression (SMD = -0.99, 95% CI [-1.73 to -0.26], = 0.008; = 90%) and when intervention duration ≥ 6 months, sport interventions was not associated with lower aggression (SMD = -0.08, 95% CI [-0.44 to -0.28], = 0.660; = 87%).
This review confirmed that sports intervention can reduce the aggression of children and adolescents. We suggested that schools can organize young people to participate in low-level, non-contact sports to reduce the occurrence of bullying, violence and other aggression-related adverse events. Additional studies are needed to determine which other variables are associated with aggression in children and adolescents, in order to develop a more detailed and comprehensive intervention programme to reduce their aggression.
探讨运动对儿童和青少年攻击性的影响,并分析干预措施中不同条件(如运动类型或干预持续时间)对干预效果的不同影响。
本研究方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42022361024)中注册。我们对 Pubmed、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库进行了系统检索,检索时间从数据库建立到 2022 年 10 月 12 日,检索所有以英文发表的研究。符合以下 PICO 标准的研究纳入本研究。所有分析均使用 Review Manager 5.3 软件进行。我们使用 SMD 汇总攻击性、敌意和愤怒评分。根据研究间异质性,采用 DerSimonian-Laird 随机效应模型或固定效应模型汇总具有 95%置信区间的汇总估计值。
共有 15 项研究被认为符合纳入本综述的标准。总体平均效应大小表明,运动干预与较低的攻击性相关(SMD=-0.37,95%CI[-0.69 至-0.06], = 0.020; = 88%)。亚组分析显示,非接触性运动与较低的攻击性相关(SMD=-0.65,95%CI[-1.17 至-0.13], = 0.020; = 92%),而高接触性运动则不相关(SMD=-0.15,95%CI[-0.55 至 0.25], = 0.470; = 79%)。此外,当干预持续时间<6 个月时,运动干预与较低的攻击性相关(SMD=-0.99,95%CI[-1.73 至-0.26], = 0.008; = 90%),而当干预持续时间≥6 个月时,运动干预与较低的攻击性不相关(SMD=-0.08,95%CI[-0.44 至-0.28], = 0.660; = 87%)。
本综述证实,运动干预可以降低儿童和青少年的攻击性。我们建议学校可以组织年轻人参加低强度、非接触性运动,以减少欺凌、暴力和其他与攻击性相关的不良事件的发生。需要进一步的研究来确定哪些其他变量与儿童和青少年的攻击性有关,以便制定更详细和全面的干预计划来降低他们的攻击性。