Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jun 21;24(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00920-1.
Literature on issues relating to comprehension during the process of obtaining informed consent (IC) has largely focused on the challenges potential participants can face in understanding the IC documents, and the strategies used to enhance comprehension of those documents. In this review, we set out to describe the factors that have an impact on comprehension and the strategies used to enhance the IC process in sub-Saharan African countries.
From November 2021 to January 2022, we conducted a literature search using a PRISMA tool. We searched electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCOHOST) to identify relevant peer reviewed studies. We then reviewed the references of these articles to find additional literature that might have been missed through the initial search. We were particularly interested in full text articles in English that focused on the IC process in SSA published between 2006 and 2020. We included systematic reviews, and studies from Western and Asian countries that included data about SSA. We excluded articles that focused on medical interventions and studies that did not require IC.
Out of the 50 studies included most were multi-country (n = 13) followed by single country studies in South Africa (n = 12); Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda (n = 5) each; Gambia, Ghana and Nigeria (n = 2)each ; and one each for Botswana, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique. We identified three areas of focus: (1) socio-cultural factors affecting IC; (2) gaps in the ethical and legal frameworks guiding the IC process; and (3) strategies used to improve participants' understanding of IC.
Our review showed wide recognition that the process of achieving IC in SSA is inherently challenging, and there are limitations in the strategies aimed at improving comprehension in IC. We suggest that there is a need for greater flexibility and negotiation with communities to ensure that the approach to IC is suited to the diverse socio-cultural contexts. We propose moving beyond the literal translations and technical language to understanding IC comprehension from the participants' perspectives and the researchers' views, while examining contextual factors that impact the IC process.
关于获取知情同意(IC)过程中理解相关问题的文献主要集中在潜在参与者在理解 IC 文件时可能面临的挑战,以及用于增强对这些文件理解的策略上。在本综述中,我们旨在描述影响理解的因素以及在撒哈拉以南非洲国家中用于增强 IC 过程的策略。
2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 1 月,我们使用 PRISMA 工具进行了文献检索。我们在电子数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、EBSCOHOST)中搜索了相关同行评审研究。然后,我们审查了这些文章的参考文献,以找到可能通过初始搜索遗漏的其他文献。我们特别关注 2006 年至 2020 年间发表的以撒哈拉以南非洲国家为重点的英文全文文章。我们纳入了系统评价,以及来自西方国家和亚洲国家的包含撒哈拉以南非洲数据的研究。我们排除了专注于医疗干预措施的文章和不需要知情同意的研究。
在纳入的 50 项研究中,大多数是多国家研究(n=13),其次是南非的单一国家研究(n=12);肯尼亚、坦桑尼亚、乌干达各有 5 项;冈比亚、加纳和尼日利亚各有 2 项;博茨瓦纳、马拉维、马里、莫桑比克各有 1 项。我们确定了三个关注领域:(1)影响知情同意的社会文化因素;(2)指导知情同意过程的伦理和法律框架中的差距;(3)用于提高参与者对知情同意理解的策略。
我们的综述表明,人们广泛认识到,在撒哈拉以南非洲国家实现知情同意的过程本质上具有挑战性,并且用于提高知情同意理解的策略存在局限性。我们建议,需要更加灵活和与社区协商,以确保知情同意的方法适合不同的社会文化背景。我们建议超越字面翻译和技术语言,从参与者和研究人员的角度理解知情同意理解,同时研究影响知情同意过程的背景因素。