• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在英国一家医院去除错误的青霉素过敏标签。

Removal of incorrect penicillin allergy labels in a UK hospital.

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust, Truro, UK.

Allergy and Immunology Department, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Oct;29(10):1338.e1-1338.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.06.024. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2023.06.024
PMID:37354996
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Penicillin allergy records are common, often incorrect and are associated with broad spectrum antibiotic use. We piloted a pharmacist-led multidisciplinary penicillin allergy de-labelling daily ward round to determine the opportunity for penicillin allergy de-labelling in a UK hospital.

METHODS

A daily ward round, delivered by antibiotic pharmacists or junior doctors, identified adult medical and surgical patients between 7 November 2022 and 31 January 2023 with a penicillin allergy record that was preventing first-line penicillin use. An allergy history was taken before risk stratifying likelihood of future harm from penicillin re-exposure and an allergy testing method was determined (direct de-label on history alone or after direct drug provocation testing). After successful allergy de-label, the antibiotic was switched to a penicillin antibiotic.

RESULTS

Of 7214 inpatients during the study period, 1133 (15.7%) had a penicillin allergy record. Of 285 allergy histories taken, 105 (36.8%) met high-risk criteria, 45 (15.8%) met low-risk criteria eligible for direct de-label and 73 (25.6%) met criteria eligible for direct drug provocation testing. We were unable to obtain a history for 61 (21.4%) patients. Of 45 low-risk patients eligible for direct de-label, 40 (88.9%) were de-labelled of whom 24 (53.3%) were switched to a penicillin antibiotic. Of 73 patients with a low-risk allergy history eligible for direct drug provocation testing, 16 (21.9%) received direct drug provocation testing, of whom 9 were switched to a penicillin antibiotic. Two direct de-label patients experienced harm (thrush within 5 days and delayed skin reaction after day 5); none of the direct drug provocation testing patients had a reaction by day 5. The switches resulted in reduced alternative antibiotic use by 173 Daily Defined Doses (DDDs).

DISCUSSION

Penicillin allergy de-labelling patient pathway delivered by pharmacists and junior doctors was safe and effective and well accepted by patients and the wider clinical teams.

摘要

目的

青霉素过敏记录很常见,且通常是不正确的,并与广谱抗生素的使用有关。我们试行由药剂师主导的多学科青霉素过敏去标签每日病房查房,以确定在英国医院进行青霉素过敏去标签的机会。

方法

由抗生素药剂师或初级医生进行的每日病房查房,确定了 2022 年 11 月 7 日至 2023 年 1 月 31 日期间,有青霉素过敏记录且该记录阻止了一线青霉素使用的成年内科和外科住院患者。在对青霉素再次暴露后发生潜在危害的可能性进行风险分层之前,会采集过敏史,并确定过敏测试方法(仅根据病史直接去标签,或在直接药物激发试验后去标签)。成功去标签过敏后,将抗生素更换为青霉素抗生素。

结果

在研究期间的 7214 名住院患者中,有 1133 名(15.7%)有青霉素过敏记录。在采集的 285 份过敏史中,105 名(36.8%)符合高风险标准,45 名(15.8%)符合低风险标准,适合直接去标签,73 名(25.6%)符合直接药物激发试验标准。我们无法获得 61 名(21.4%)患者的病史。在 45 名符合直接去标签标准的低风险患者中,有 40 名(88.9%)去标签,其中 24 名(53.3%)更换为青霉素抗生素。在 73 名有低风险过敏史且适合直接药物激发试验的患者中,有 16 名(21.9%)接受了直接药物激发试验,其中 9 名更换为青霉素抗生素。两名直接去标签患者出现了不良反应(5 天内出现鹅口疮和 5 天后出现迟发性皮肤反应);没有直接药物激发试验患者在第 5 天出现不良反应。这些转换减少了 173 个日剂量(DDD)的替代抗生素使用。

讨论

由药剂师和初级医生提供的青霉素过敏去标签患者途径是安全有效的,并且得到了患者和更广泛的临床团队的认可。

相似文献

1
Removal of incorrect penicillin allergy labels in a UK hospital.在英国一家医院去除错误的青霉素过敏标签。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Oct;29(10):1338.e1-1338.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.06.024. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
2
Evaluation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling ward round: a novel antimicrobial stewardship intervention.评价药师主导的青霉素过敏去标签病房查房:一种新的抗菌药物管理干预措施。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jun 1;74(6):1725-1730. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz082.
3
DALES, Drug Allergy Labels in Elective Surgical patients: a prospective multicentre cross-sectional study of incidence, risks, and attitudes in penicillin de-labelling strategies.《选择性手术患者中的药物过敏标签:去青霉素标签策略中的发生率、风险和态度的前瞻性多中心横断面研究》。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Dec;125(6):962-969. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.07.048. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
4
Implementation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling service in a public hospital.在一家公立医院实施药师主导的青霉素过敏去标签服务。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 May 1;74(5):1438-1446. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky575.
5
Barriers to paediatric penicillin allergy de-labelling in UK secondary care: a regional survey.英国二级医疗中儿童青霉素过敏重新认定的障碍:一项区域调查
Arch Dis Child. 2023 May;108(5):363-366. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324564. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
6
Direct oral amoxicillin challenge without preliminary skin testing in adult patients with allergy and at low risk with reported penicillin allergy.在报告有青霉素过敏的成年过敏患者且低风险患者中,不进行初步皮肤试验直接口服阿莫西林激发试验。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Jan 1;40(1):57-61. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4184.
7
A pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling project within a preoperative assessment clinic: the low-hanging fruit is within reach.药剂师主导的术前评估门诊青霉素过敏去标签项目:低挂的果实触手可及。
J Hosp Infect. 2023 Sep;139:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.06.012. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
8
Penicillin allergy de-labelling ahead of elective surgery: feasibility and barriers.择期手术前青霉素过敏去标签化:可行性和障碍。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jul;123(1):e110-e116. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
9
The role of a clinical pharmacist in spurious Penicillin allergy: a narrative review.临床药师在青霉素伪过敏反应中的作用:叙事性综述。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Jun;43(3):461-475. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01226-7. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
10
Focus group study exploring the issues and the solutions to incorrect penicillin allergy-labelled patients: an antibiotic stewardship patient safety initiative.聚焦小组研究探索青霉素过敏标签错误患者的问题和解决方案:抗生素管理患者安全计划。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Mar;28(2):71-75. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-001863. Epub 2019 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Description of the combined evidence-based, theory-based and person-based approaches used to develop a behavioural intervention package to support non-allergist healthcare workers to remove incorrect penicillin allergy records from medical and surgical adult inpatients in a UK hospital.描述为制定一项行为干预方案所采用的循证、基于理论和基于个体的综合方法,该方案旨在支持英国一家医院的非过敏症专科医护人员删除成年内科和外科住院患者病历中错误的青霉素过敏记录。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 30;15(7):e096452. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096452.
2
Narrative review of recent developments and the future of penicillin allergy de-labelling by non-allergists.非过敏症专科医生对青霉素过敏去标签化的最新进展及未来的叙述性综述。
NPJ Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Jul 10;2(1):18. doi: 10.1038/s44259-024-00035-6.
3
Experiences of an inpatient penicillin allergy de-labelling pathway: capturing the patient voice.住院患者青霉素过敏标签去除流程的经验:倾听患者声音
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Feb 9;6(1):dlae020. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae020. eCollection 2024 Feb.