J Am Dent Assoc. 2023 Aug;154(8):742-752.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2023.05.003. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
Hemostatic agents are used to control bleeding after tooth extraction and have been compared with conventional measures (that is, sutures or gauze pressure) in several studies. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the benefits of topical hemostatic agents for controlling bleeding after tooth extractions, especially in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy.
The authors conducted a literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, including prospective human randomized clinical trials in which researchers compared hemostatic agents with conventional methods and reported the time to achieve hemostasis and postoperative bleeding events.
Seventeen articles were eligible for inclusion. Hemostatic agents resulted in a significantly shorter time to achieve hemostasis in both healthy patients and patients taking antithrombotic drugs (standardized mean difference, -1.02; 95% CI, -1.70 to -0.35; P = .003 and standardized mean difference, -2.30; 95% CI, -3.20 to -1.39; P < .00001, respectively). Significantly fewer bleeding events were noted when hemostatic agents were used (risk ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.88; P = .007). All forms of hemostatic agents (that is, mouthrinse, gel, hemostatic plug, and gauze soaked with the agent) had better efficacy in reducing the number of postoperative bleeding events than conventional hemostasis measures, except for hemostatic sponges. However, this was based on a small number of studies in each subgroup.
The use of hemostatic agents seemed to offer better bleeding control after tooth extractions in patients on antithrombotic drugs than conventional measures.
Findings of this systematic review may help clinicians attain more efficient hemostasis in patients requiring tooth extraction. This systematic review is registered in the PROSPERO database. The registration number is CRD42021256145.
止血剂用于控制拔牙后的出血,在几项研究中已将其与常规措施(即缝合或纱布压迫)进行了比较。本系统评价的目的是评估局部止血剂在控制拔牙后出血方面的益处,尤其是在接受抗血栓治疗的患者中。
作者在 MEDLINE(PubMed)、Scopus 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中进行了文献检索,包括比较止血剂与常规方法并报告达到止血时间和术后出血事件的前瞻性人类随机临床试验。
有 17 篇文章符合纳入标准。在健康患者和服用抗血栓药物的患者中,止血剂均能显著缩短达到止血所需的时间(标准化均数差,-1.02;95%CI,-1.70 至-0.35;P=0.003 和标准化均数差,-2.30;95%CI,-3.20 至-1.39;P<.00001)。使用止血剂时,出血事件明显减少(风险比,0.62;95%CI,0.44 至 0.88;P=0.007)。除了止血海绵外,所有形式的止血剂(即漱口液、凝胶、止血栓和浸有止血剂的纱布)在减少术后出血事件数量方面均优于常规止血措施,但这是基于每个亚组中少数几项研究的结果。
与常规措施相比,在服用抗血栓药物的患者中,使用止血剂似乎能更好地控制拔牙后的出血。
本系统评价的结果可能有助于临床医生在需要拔牙的患者中实现更有效的止血。本系统评价已在 PROSPERO 数据库中注册,注册号为 CRD42021256145。