,400016.
Department of Hematology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China.
Med Ultrason. 2023 Sep 29;25(3):255-262. doi: 10.11152/mu-4007. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
To investigate the feasibility of assessing the ecacy of non-surgical treatment for gastric lymphoma using oral contrast-enhanced ultrasound (OCEUS) and double contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS).
A total of 27 patients with gastric lymphoma treated nonoperatively were included in this retrospective study. The ecacy was evaluated using OCEUS and CT, respectively, and the results were tested for kappa concordance. Sixteen of the 27 patients underwent multiple DCEUS examinations before and after treatment. Micro-perfusion of the lesion in DCEUS is represented by the Echo Intensity Ratio (EIR), (echo intensity of the lymphoma lesion/echo intensity of the normal gastric wall), and one-way ANOVA was used to compare the differences between groups in EIR values before and after treatment.
OCEUS and CT were highly consistent in assessing the efficacy of gastric lymphoma, with a Kappa value of 0.758. During a median follow-up of 8.8 months, there was no statistical difference between the complete remission rate obtained by OCEUS and that obtained by endoscopic and CT (25.93% vs. 44.44%, p=0.154; 25.93% vs. 33.33%, p=0.766). There was also no statistical difference in the time to achieve complete remission using OCEUS assessment and endoscopy and CT (4.71±1.03 months vs. 6.01±2.14 months, p=0.088; 4.47±1.84 months vs. 6.01±2.14 months p=0.143). The difference in EIR between the groups before treat-ment and after different numbers of treatments was statistically signifficant (p<0.05), and post hoc analysis revealed this dif-ference as early as after the second treatment (p<0.05).
Transabdominal OCEUS and CT are comparable in the assessment of gastric lymphoma treatment ecacy. DCEUS is a noninvasive, cost-effective, and widely available method for gastric lymphoma therapeutic effect evaluation. Therefore, transabdominal OCEUS and DCEUS have the potential to be used for the early assessment of the ecacy of the non-surgical treatment of gastric lymphoma.
探讨口服超声造影(OCEUS)和双对比增强超声(DCEUS)评估胃淋巴瘤非手术治疗效果的可行性。
本回顾性研究共纳入 27 例接受非手术治疗的胃淋巴瘤患者。分别采用 OCEUS 和 CT 评估疗效,并对结果进行kappa 一致性检验。27 例患者中有 16 例在治疗前后接受了多次 DCEUS 检查。DCEUS 中病变的微血管灌注用回声强度比(EIR)表示(淋巴瘤病灶的回声强度/正常胃壁的回声强度),采用单因素方差分析比较治疗前后各组 EIR 值的差异。
OCEUS 和 CT 在评估胃淋巴瘤疗效方面高度一致,kappa 值为 0.758。在中位随访 8.8 个月期间,OCEUS 获得的完全缓解率与内镜和 CT 获得的完全缓解率无统计学差异(25.93%比 44.44%,p=0.154;25.93%比 33.33%,p=0.766)。OCEUS 评估与内镜和 CT 达到完全缓解的时间也无统计学差异(4.71±1.03 个月比 6.01±2.14 个月,p=0.088;4.47±1.84 个月比 6.01±2.14 个月,p=0.143)。治疗前和不同治疗次数后 EIR 组间差异有统计学意义(p<0.05),事后分析显示,这种差异早在第二次治疗后就存在(p<0.05)。
经腹 OCEUS 和 CT 在评估胃淋巴瘤治疗效果方面具有可比性。DCEUS 是一种非侵入性、经济有效且广泛可用的胃淋巴瘤治疗效果评估方法。因此,经腹 OCEUS 和 DCEUS 有可能用于早期评估胃淋巴瘤非手术治疗的疗效。