Suppr超能文献

孤立性髋部骨折的两种手术路径:一项比较研究。

Two surgical pathways for isolated hip fractures: A comparative study.

作者信息

Fokin Alexander A, Wycech Knight Joanna, Darya Maral, Stalder Ryan, Puente Ivan, Weisz Russell D

机构信息

Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, FL 33484, United States.

Department of Surgery, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States.

出版信息

World J Orthop. 2023 Jun 18;14(6):399-410. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i6.399.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures (HF) are common among the aging population, and surgery within 48 h is recommended. Patients can be hospitalized for surgery through different pathways, either trauma or medicine admitting services.

AIM

To compare management and outcomes among patients admitted through the trauma pathway (TP) medical pathway (MP).

METHODS

This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study included 2094 patients with proximal femur fractures (AO/Orthopedic Trauma Association Type 31) who underwent surgery at a level 1 trauma center between 2016-2021. There were 69 patients admitted through the TP and 2025 admitted through the MP. To ensure comparability between groups, 66 of the 2025 MP patients were propensity matched to 66 TP patients by age, sex, HF type, HF surgery, and American Society of Anesthesiology score. The statistical analyses included multivariable analysis, group characteristics, and bivariate correlation comparisons with the ² test and -test.

RESULTS

After propensity matching, the mean age in both groups was 75-years-old, 62% of both groups were females, the main HF type was intertrochanteric (TP 52% MP 62%), open reduction internal fixation was the most common surgery (TP 68% MP 71%), and the mean American Society of Anesthesiology score was 2.8 for TP and 2.7 for MP. The majority of patients in TP and MP (71% 74%) were geriatric (≥ 65-years-old). Falls were the main mechanism of injury in both groups (77% 97%, = 0.001). There were no significant differences in pre-surgery anticoagulation use (49% 41%), admission day of the week, or insurance status. The incidence of comorbidities was equal (94% for both) with cardiac comorbidities being dominant in both groups (71% 73%). The number of preoperative consultations was similar for TP and MP, with the most common consultation being cardiology in both (44% and 36%). HF displacement occurred more among TP patients (76% 39%, = 0.000). Time to surgery was not statistically different (23 h in both), but length of surgery was significantly longer for TP (59 min 41 min, = 0.000) Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were not statistically different (5 d 8 d and 6 d for both). There were no statistical differences in discharge disposition and mortality (3% 0%).

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in outcomes of surgeries between admission through TP MP. The focus should be on the patient's health condition and on prompt surgical intervention.

摘要

背景

髋部骨折(HF)在老年人群中很常见,建议在48小时内进行手术。患者可通过不同途径住院接受手术,即创伤或内科收治服务。

目的

比较通过创伤途径(TP)和内科途径(MP)收治的患者的管理情况和治疗结果。

方法

这项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究纳入了2094例股骨近端骨折(AO/骨科创伤协会31型)患者,这些患者于2016年至2021年在一级创伤中心接受手术。其中69例通过TP途径收治,2025例通过MP途径收治。为确保两组之间具有可比性,在2025例MP患者中,66例通过年龄、性别、HF类型、HF手术和美国麻醉医师协会评分与66例TP患者进行倾向匹配。统计分析包括多变量分析、组间特征以及采用卡方检验和t检验进行的双变量相关性比较。

结果

倾向匹配后,两组的平均年龄均为75岁,两组中62%为女性,主要HF类型为转子间骨折(TP组为52%,MP组为62%),切开复位内固定是最常见的手术方式(TP组为68%,MP组为71%),TP组的平均美国麻醉医师协会评分为2.8,MP组为2.7。TP组和MP组的大多数患者(71%和74%)为老年人(≥65岁)。跌倒为两组的主要受伤机制(分别为77%和97%,P = 0.001)。术前抗凝药物使用情况(49%对41%)、入院星期几或保险状况无显著差异。合并症发生率相同(均为94%),两组中心脏合并症均占主导(分别为71%和73%)。TP组和MP组术前会诊次数相似,最常见的会诊科室均为心内科(分别为44%和36%)。TP组患者中HF移位情况更多见(76%对39%,P = 0.000)。手术时间无统计学差异(两组均为23小时),但TP组的手术时长显著更长(59分钟对41分钟,P = 0.000)。重症监护病房住院时间和住院总时长无统计学差异(分别为5天对8天和两组均为6天)。出院处置和死亡率无统计学差异(3%对0%)。

结论

通过TP途径和MP途径收治的患者手术结果无差异。应关注患者的健康状况并及时进行手术干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f719/10292054/236bb4552ec5/WJO-14-399-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验