Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Avcılar, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Institute of Graduate Studies, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Avcılar, Istanbul, Turkey.
Reprod Domest Anim. 2023 Sep;58(9):1251-1260. doi: 10.1111/rda.14425. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
Synchronization of donor cells is an important step for the success of somatic cell nuclear transfer application and facilitates the development of embryos. Contact inhibition, serum starvation and different chemical agents are used in synchronizing different types of somatic cells. In this study, to synchronize the primary ovine adult (POF) and foetal (POFF) fibroblast cells to G0/G1 phases, the contact inhibition, the serum starvation, roscovitine and trichostatin A (TSA) methods were used. In the first part of the study, roscovitine (10, 15, 20 and 30 μM) and TSA (25, 50, 75 and 100 nM) were applied for 24 h to determine the optimal concentration for POF and POFF cells. In the second part, optimal concentrations of roscovitine and TSA for these cells were compared with contact inhibition and serum starvation methods. Cell cycle distribution and apoptotic activity analysis were performed by flow cytometry to compare this synchronization methods. Serum starvation method resulted in higher cell synchronization rate in both cells compared to other groups. Although contact inhibition and TSA also achieved high success rates of synchronized cell value, it was observed that the difference between serum starvation and these groups was significant (p < .05). When the apoptosis rates of the two cell types were examined, it was observed that the early apoptotic cells in contact inhibition and late apoptotic cells in the serum starvation were higher than the other groups (p < .05). Although the 10 and 15 μM concentrations of roscovitine gave the lowest apoptosis rates, it was observed that it failed to synchronize both the ovine fibroblast cells to G0/G1 phase. As a result, it was concluded that while roscovitine was not successful to synchronize both the POFF and POF cell lines, TSA (50 nM for POF cells and 100 nM for POFF cells) can be used efficiently as an alternative to the contact inhibition and the serum starvation methods.
供体细胞的同步化是体细胞核移植应用成功的重要步骤,有利于胚胎的发育。接触抑制、血清饥饿和不同的化学试剂被用于同步不同类型的体细胞。在这项研究中,为了将绵羊原代成纤维细胞(POF)和胎儿成纤维细胞(POFF)同步到 G0/G1 期,使用了接触抑制、血清饥饿、罗司维亭和曲古抑菌素 A(TSA)方法。在研究的第一部分,将罗司维亭(10、15、20 和 30μM)和 TSA(25、50、75 和 100nM)应用于 POF 和 POFF 细胞 24 小时,以确定这些细胞的最佳浓度。在第二部分,将这些细胞的罗司维亭和 TSA 的最佳浓度与接触抑制和血清饥饿方法进行了比较。通过流式细胞术分析细胞周期分布和凋亡活性,比较了这些同步化方法。与其他组相比,血清饥饿法使两种细胞的同步化率更高。虽然接触抑制和 TSA 也获得了高同步化细胞值的成功率,但观察到血清饥饿与这些组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。当检查两种细胞类型的凋亡率时,观察到接触抑制中的早期凋亡细胞和血清饥饿中的晚期凋亡细胞高于其他组(p<0.05)。虽然 10 和 15μM 浓度的罗司维亭产生的凋亡率最低,但观察到它未能使两种绵羊成纤维细胞同步到 G0/G1 期。因此,结论是,虽然罗司维亭不能成功地将 POFF 和 POF 细胞系同步化,但 TSA(POF 细胞 50nM,POFF 细胞 100nM)可以作为接触抑制和血清饥饿方法的替代方法有效地使用。