Interventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Endoscopy. 2023 Dec;55(12):1118-1123. doi: 10.1055/a-2122-1671. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
Reliable documentation is essential for maintaining quality standards in endoscopy; however, in clinical practice, report quality varies. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based prototype for the measurement of withdrawal and intervention times, and automatic photodocumentation. METHOD: A multiclass deep learning algorithm distinguishing different endoscopic image content was trained with 10 557 images (1300 examinations, nine centers, four processors). Consecutively, the algorithm was used to calculate withdrawal time (AI prediction) and extract relevant images. Validation was performed on 100 colonoscopy videos (five centers). The reported and AI-predicted withdrawal times were compared with video-based measurement; photodocumentation was compared for documented polypectomies. RESULTS: Video-based measurement in 100 colonoscopies revealed a median absolute difference of 2.0 minutes between the measured and reported withdrawal times, compared with 0.4 minutes for AI predictions. The original photodocumentation represented the cecum in 88 examinations compared with 98/100 examinations for the AI-generated documentation. For 39/104 polypectomies, the examiners' photographs included the instrument, compared with 68 for the AI images. Lastly, we demonstrated real-time capability (10 colonoscopies). CONCLUSION : Our AI system calculates withdrawal time, provides an image report, and is real-time ready. After further validation, the system may improve standardized reporting, while decreasing the workload created by routine documentation.
可靠的文件记录对于维持内镜质量标准至关重要;然而,在临床实践中,报告质量存在差异。我们开发了一种基于人工智能(AI)的原型,用于测量退出和干预时间以及自动摄影记录。方法:使用 10557 张图像(1300 次检查,9 个中心,4 个处理器)训练用于区分不同内镜图像内容的多类别深度学习算法。然后,使用该算法计算退出时间(AI 预测)并提取相关图像。在 100 个结肠镜检查视频(5 个中心)上进行验证。将报告的和 AI 预测的退出时间与基于视频的测量进行比较;对记录的息肉切除术进行摄影记录比较。结果:在 100 例结肠镜检查中,基于视频的测量显示,测量的退出时间与报告的退出时间之间的中位数绝对差异为 2.0 分钟,而 AI 预测的差异为 0.4 分钟。原始摄影记录在 88 次检查中代表了盲肠,而 AI 生成的摄影记录在 100 次检查中代表了盲肠。对于 39/104 例息肉切除术,检查者的照片包括器械,而 AI 图像包括 68 例。最后,我们展示了实时能力(10 例结肠镜检查)。结论:我们的 AI 系统计算退出时间,提供图像报告,并且可以实时使用。在进一步验证后,该系统可能会提高标准化报告的质量,同时减少常规文档创建的工作量。