[伦理委员会在学术研究项目评估中的变异性与差异]
[Variability and discrepancies between Ethics Committees in the evaluation of academic research projects].
作者信息
Cuestas Eduardo
机构信息
Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba.
出版信息
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2023 Jun 30;80(2):85-87. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v80.n2.39412.
Abstract
Editorial: Variability and discrepancies between Ethics Committees in the evaluation of academic research projects.
摘要
社论
伦理委员会在学术研究项目评估中的差异与分歧
相似文献
1
[Variability and discrepancies between Ethics Committees in the evaluation of academic research projects].
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2023 Jun 30;80(2):85-87. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v80.n2.39412.
2
Los comités de investigación en salud: su autoridad, responsabilidad fundamental y necesidad de que se sometan a auditorías periódicas.
Gac Med Mex. 2019;155(4):406-409. doi: 10.24875/GMM.18004725.
3
Research and research ethics committees and the obligation for them to operate in accordance with the principle of the social covenant.
Gac Med Mex. 2020;156(2):138-141. doi: 10.24875/GMM.M20000355.
4
[Review of the methodological, ethical, legal and social issues of research projects in healthcare with big data].
Gac Sanit. 2018 Nov-Dec;32(6):576-578. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 May 31.
5
Informed consent: its importance for retrolective research and medical science progress.
Gac Med Mex. 2021;157(1):90-93. doi: 10.24875/GMM.20000227.
6
[Accreditation of Independent Ethics Committees].
Gac Sanit. 2017 Jan-Feb;31(1):53-56. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
7
Biothics in Brazil.
Bioethics. 1999 Jul;13(3-4):244-8. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00152.
8
Experiencias sobre el impacto del Programa de Formación en Ética de la Investigación Biomédica y Psicosocial en el ámbito de la salud mental y la investigación conductual.
Acta Bioeth. 2012;18(1):69-76. doi: 10.4067/s1726-569x2012000100005.
9
Research and hospital ethics committees in Switzerland.
HEC Forum. 1992;4(1):41-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00117615.
10
[The research ethics committees: the French example of the Comités de Protection des Personnes].
J Int Bioethique. 2012 Jun;23(2):117-29, 180. doi: 10.3917/jib.232.0117.
本文引用的文献
1
Variability in Ethics Review for Multicenter Protocols in Buenos Aires, Argentina. An Observational Study.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Feb-Apr;18(1-2):69-77. doi: 10.1177/15562646221134620. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
2
Planning and managing a complex multisite study in the age of technology.
Nurs Forum. 2019 Oct;54(4):707-713. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12401. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
3
The efficiency of single institutional review board review in National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network-initiated clinical trials.
Clin Trials. 2019 Feb;16(1):3-10. doi: 10.1177/1740774518807888. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
4
Improving the process of research ethics review.
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 Aug 18;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0038-7. eCollection 2017.
5
Need for clinical research in children and young people.
BMJ. 2015 Dec 23;351:h6902. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6902.
6
The voices of children and young people in health: where are we now?
Arch Dis Child. 2015 Oct;100(10):915-7. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307492. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
7
Analysis of research ethics board approval times in an academic department of medicine.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Apr;10(2):145-50. doi: 10.1177/1556264615571557. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
8
Ethics review of pediatric multi-center drug trials.
Paediatr Drugs. 2015 Feb;17(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s40272-014-0098-9.
9
The ethics of health systems research in low- and middle-income countries: a call to action.
Glob Public Health. 2014;9(9):1008-22. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.931998. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
10
Barriers to research on research ethics review and conflicts of interest.
IRB. 2013 Sep-Oct;35(5):14-9.
Zotero 插件