Henry Cyndi, Biardel Sabrina, Boucher Magali, Godbout Krystelle, Chakir Jamila, Côté Andréanne, Laviolette Michel, Bossé Ynuk
Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ) - Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ) - Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Respir Med. 2023 Oct;217:107340. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107340. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
Bronchial thermoplasty is an effective intervention to improve respiratory symptoms and to reduce the rate of exacerbations in uncontrolled severe asthma. A reduction in airway smooth muscle is arguably the most widely discussed mechanisms accounting for these clinical benefits. Yet, this smooth muscle reduction should also translate into an impaired response to bronchodilator drugs. This study was designed to address this question.
Eight patients with clinical indication for thermoplasty were studied. They were uncontrolled severe asthmatics despite optimal environmental control, treatment of comorbidities, and the use of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonists. Lung function measured by spirometry and respiratory mechanics measured by oscillometry were examined pre- and post-bronchodilator (salbutamol, 400 μg), both before and at least 1 year after thermoplasty.
Consistent with previous studies, thermoplasty yielded no benefits in terms of baseline lung function and respiratory mechanics, despite improving symptoms based on two asthma questionnaires (ACQ-5 and ACT-5). The response to salbutamol was also not affected by thermoplasty based on spirometric readouts, including forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV/FVC ratio. However, a significant interaction was observed between thermoplasty and salbutamol for two oscillometric readouts, namely reactance at 5 Hz (X) and reactance area (Ax), showing an attenuated response to salbutamol after thermoplasty.
Thermoplasty attenuates the response to a bronchodilator. We argue that this result is a physiological proof of therapeutic efficacy, consistent with the well-described effect of thermoplasty in reducing the amount of airway smooth muscle.
支气管热成形术是一种有效的干预措施,可改善呼吸道症状并降低未控制的重度哮喘的急性加重率。气道平滑肌减少可以说是解释这些临床益处时讨论最为广泛的机制。然而,这种平滑肌减少也应转化为对支气管扩张剂药物反应的受损。本研究旨在解决这个问题。
对8例有热成形术临床指征的患者进行了研究。尽管进行了最佳的环境控制、合并症治疗以及使用了高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素和长效β受体激动剂,但他们仍为未控制的重度哮喘患者。在支气管扩张剂(沙丁胺醇,400μg)使用前和使用后,以及热成形术前和术后至少1年,分别通过肺量计测量肺功能,并通过振荡法测量呼吸力学。
与先前的研究一致,尽管根据两份哮喘问卷(ACQ - 5和ACT - 5)症状有所改善,但热成形术在基线肺功能和呼吸力学方面并未带来益处。根据肺量计读数,包括1秒用力呼气量(FEV)、用力肺活量(FVC)和FEV/FVC比值,对沙丁胺醇的反应也未受热成形术影响。然而,对于两个振荡法读数,即5Hz时的电抗(X)和电抗面积(Ax),观察到热成形术与沙丁胺醇之间存在显著相互作用,表明热成形术后对沙丁胺醇的反应减弱。
热成形术减弱了对支气管扩张剂的反应。我们认为这一结果是治疗效果的生理学证据,与热成形术在减少气道平滑肌量方面的明确效果一致。