Suppr超能文献

心脏植入式电子设备组件的超敏反应及其治疗:一项系统综述

Hypersensitivity Reactions to Components of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Their Treatment: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Kealaher Emma, Shah Parin, Dissanayake Tharindra, Thomas Dewi E, Barry James, Margulescu Andrei D

机构信息

Regional Cardiac Centre, Morriston Hospital, Morriston, Swansea, UK.

出版信息

Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2023 Apr 13;12:e08. doi: 10.15420/aer.2022.23. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to components of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are rare but difficult to differentiate from device infection. Data on best management strategies of HSRs to CIEDs are lacking. The aims of this systematic review are to summarise the available literature on the aetiology, diagnosis and management of HSR in CIED patients and to provide guidance on best management strategies for these patients. A systematic search for publications on HSR to CIED in PubMed from January 1970 to November 2022 was conducted, resulting in 43 publications reporting on 57 individual cases. The quality of data was low. The mean age was 57 ± 21 years, and 48% of patients were women. The mean time from implant to diagnosis was 29 ± 59 months. Multiple allergens were identified in 11 patients (19%). In 14 cases (25%) no allergen was identified. Blood tests were mostly normal (55%), but eosinophilia (23%), raised inflammatory markers (18%) and raised immunoglobulin E (5%) were also encountered. Symptoms included local reactions, systemic reactions or both in 77%, 21% and 7% of patients, respectively. Explantation of CIED and reimplantation of another CIED coated with a non-allergenic material was usually successful. Use of topical or systemic steroids was associated with high failure rates. Based on the limited data available, the treatment of choice for HSRs to CIEDs is full CIED removal, reassessment of CIED indication and reimplantation of devices coated in non-allergenic materials. Steroids (topical/systemic) have limited efficiency and should not be used. There is an urgent need for further research in this field.

摘要

对心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)组件的超敏反应(HSR)很少见,但难以与设备感染相区分。目前缺乏关于CIED超敏反应最佳管理策略的数据。本系统评价的目的是总结关于CIED患者超敏反应的病因、诊断和管理的现有文献,并为这些患者的最佳管理策略提供指导。对1970年1月至2022年11月期间PubMed上关于CIED超敏反应的出版物进行了系统检索,共检索到43篇报告57例个体病例的出版物。数据质量较低。患者的平均年龄为57±21岁,48%为女性。从植入到诊断的平均时间为29±59个月。11例患者(19%)中鉴定出多种过敏原。14例(25%)未鉴定出过敏原。血液检查大多正常(55%),但也发现了嗜酸性粒细胞增多(23%)、炎症标志物升高(18%)和免疫球蛋白E升高(5%)。症状包括局部反应、全身反应或两者兼有,分别见于77%、21%和7%的患者。取出CIED并重新植入另一个涂有非致敏材料的CIED通常是成功的。使用局部或全身类固醇的失败率较高。基于有限的现有数据,CIED超敏反应的首选治疗方法是完全取出CIED,重新评估CIED植入指征,并重新植入涂有非致敏材料的设备。类固醇(局部/全身)疗效有限,不应使用。该领域迫切需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5327/10326667/d6e74c4219a8/aer-12-e08-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验