Smith Celia G, Jones Emily J H, Wass Sam V, Jacobs Dean, Fitzpatrick Cassie, Charman Tony
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience King's College London London UK.
Birkbeck University of London London UK.
JCPP Adv. 2022 Nov 19;2(4):e12116. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12116. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Infants of parents with perinatal anxiety are at elevated likelihood of experiencing disruption in the parent-infant relationship, as well as difficulties with socio-emotional functioning in later development. Interventions delivered in the perinatal period have the potential to protect the early dyadic relationship and support infants' ongoing development and socio-emotional outcomes. This review primarily aimed to examine the efficacy of perinatal interventions on parent anxiety, infant socio-emotional development/temperament, and parent-infant relationship outcomes. Secondarily, the review sought to understand how interventions focused principally on one member of the dyad affected the outcomes of the other, and which intervention components were common to successful interventions.
Five electronic databases as well as manual search procedures were used to identify randomised controlled trials according to a PICO eligibility criteria framework. Risk of bias assessments were undertaken, and a narrative synthesis was conducted. The review was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021254799).
Twelve studies were analysed in total, including five interventions focused on the adult, and seven interventions focused on the infant, or the infant's relationship with their parent. Interventions incorporating cognitive behavioural strategies for affective disorders showed reductions in parent anxiety ( = 3), and interventions focusing on altering distorted maternal internal representations showed positive change in parent-child dyadic interactions, and infant outcomes ( = 2). Evidence that interventions focused on one partner of the dyad led to improved outcomes for the other partner was limited. However, evidence was of mixed methodological quality.
It is important to integrate both parents and infants into treatment programmes for perinatal anxiety. Implications for clinical practice and future intervention trials are discussed.
父母患有围产期焦虑症的婴儿,其亲子关系出现破裂的可能性增加,并且在后期发育中社会情感功能方面存在困难。围产期实施的干预措施有可能保护早期的二元关系,并支持婴儿的持续发育及社会情感发展结果。本综述主要旨在研究围产期干预措施对父母焦虑、婴儿社会情感发展/气质以及亲子关系结果的疗效。其次,该综述试图了解主要针对二元关系中一方成员的干预措施如何影响另一方的结果,以及成功的干预措施有哪些共同的干预成分。
根据PICO纳入标准框架,使用五个电子数据库以及手动检索程序来识别随机对照试验。进行了偏倚风险评估,并进行了叙述性综合分析。该综述已在PROSPERO(CRD42021254799)上预先注册。
总共分析了12项研究,其中包括五项针对成人的干预措施,以及七项针对婴儿或婴儿与其父母关系的干预措施。纳入针对情感障碍的认知行为策略的干预措施显示父母焦虑有所降低(n = 3),而侧重于改变母亲扭曲的内部表征的干预措施显示亲子二元互动以及婴儿结局有积极变化(n = 2)。关于针对二元关系中一方伴侣的干预措施能改善另一方伴侣结局的证据有限。然而,证据的方法学质量参差不齐。
将父母和婴儿都纳入围产期焦虑治疗方案很重要。讨论了对临床实践和未来干预试验的启示。