• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于开发公共卫生干预措施、信息传递和指导的敏捷共同制定和评估框架。

The Agile Co-production and Evaluation framework for developing public health interventions, messaging and guidance.

机构信息

NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 26;11:1094753. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1094753. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1094753
PMID:37435513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10331616/
Abstract

A lesson identified from the COVID-19 pandemic is that we need to extend existing best practice for intervention development. In particular, we need to integrate (a) state-of-the-art methods of rapidly coproducing public health interventions and messaging to support all population groups to protect themselves and their communities with (b) methods of rapidly evaluating co-produced interventions to determine which are acceptable and effective. This paper describes the Agile Co-production and Evaluation (ACE) framework, which is intended to provide a focus for investigating new ways of rapidly developing effective interventions and messaging by combining co-production methods with large-scale testing and/or real-world evaluation. We briefly review some of the participatory, qualitative and quantitative methods that could potentially be combined and propose a research agenda to further develop, refine and validate packages of methods in a variety of public health contexts to determine which combinations are feasible, cost-effective and achieve the goal of improving health and reducing health inequalities.

摘要

从 COVID-19 大流行中吸取的一个教训是,我们需要扩展现有的干预措施开发最佳实践。特别是,我们需要将(a)快速制作公共卫生干预措施和信息的最先进方法,以及(b)快速评估共同制作的干预措施以确定哪些是可接受和有效的方法,整合到一起。本文介绍了敏捷共同制作和评估 (ACE) 框架,旨在通过将共同制作方法与大规模测试和/或真实世界评估相结合,为研究快速开发有效干预措施和信息的新方法提供重点。我们简要回顾了一些潜在的参与式、定性和定量方法,并提出了一个研究议程,以进一步在各种公共卫生环境中开发、改进和验证方法包,以确定哪些组合是可行的、具有成本效益的,并实现改善健康和减少健康不平等的目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e05/10331616/c5e8610938e1/fpubh-11-1094753-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e05/10331616/c5e8610938e1/fpubh-11-1094753-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e05/10331616/c5e8610938e1/fpubh-11-1094753-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Agile Co-production and Evaluation framework for developing public health interventions, messaging and guidance.用于开发公共卫生干预措施、信息传递和指导的敏捷共同制定和评估框架。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 26;11:1094753. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1094753. eCollection 2023.
2
Pharmacy Emergency Preparedness and Response (PEPR): a proposed framework for expanding pharmacy professionals' roles and contributions to emergency preparedness and response during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.药房应急准备和响应 (Pharmacy Emergency Preparedness and Response,PEPR):在 COVID-19 大流行期间及之后,扩大药剂师专业人员在应急准备和响应方面的作用和贡献的拟议框架。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Jan;17(1):1967-1977. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
3
A scoping review of behavioural science approaches and frameworks for health protection and emergency response.关于健康保护与应急响应的行为科学方法及框架的范围综述。
Perspect Public Health. 2024 Jun 10:17579139241257102. doi: 10.1177/17579139241257102.
4
Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.通过全科医疗减少健康不平等:一个现实主义综述和行动框架。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(7):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTWW7032.
5
Optimising a co-production framework for developing public health interventions: application and testing of school-based Research Action Groups.优化公共卫生干预措施制定的共同制定框架:基于学校的研究行动小组的应用和测试。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 14;21(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01086-3.
6
Communication to promote and support physical distancing for COVID-19 prevention and control.促进和支持预防和控制 COVID-19 的物理隔离的沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 9;10(10):CD015144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015144.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Engaging faith communities in public health messaging in response to COVID-19: Lessons learnt from the pandemic in Ituri, Democratic Republic of Congo.在应对 COVID-19 过程中,通过公共卫生信息宣传吸引信仰社区参与:来自刚果民主共和国伊图里疫情的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 13;10:916062. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.916062. eCollection 2022.
9
Co-designing a theory-informed, multicomponent intervention to increase vaccine uptake with Congolese migrants: A qualitative, community-based participatory research study (LISOLO MALAMU).以社区为基础的参与式研究:与刚果移民共同设计一项基于理论、多组分的干预措施以提高疫苗接种率(LISOLO MALAMU)。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13884. doi: 10.1111/hex.13884. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
10
Co-Designing a Framework for Social Media Health Communication to Young People: A Participatory Research Study.共同设计面向年轻人的社交媒体健康传播框架:一项参与式研究
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70203. doi: 10.1111/hex.70203.

引用本文的文献

1
The person-based approach to intervention development: A scoping review of methods and applications.基于个体的干预开发方法:方法与应用的范围综述
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 9;11:20552076241305934. doi: 10.1177/20552076241305934. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
An opportunity to sleep well in hospital: development of a multi-level intervention to improve inpatient sleep (ASLEEP) using behaviour change theories.在医院睡个好觉的机会:运用行为改变理论开发一项多层次干预措施以改善住院患者睡眠(ASLEEP)
BMC Psychol. 2024 Dec 27;12(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02281-9.
3
Qualitative service evaluation of a multimodal pilot service for early detection of liver disease in high-risk groups: 'Alright My Liver?'.

本文引用的文献

1
A scoping review of behavioural science approaches and frameworks for health protection and emergency response.关于健康保护与应急响应的行为科学方法及框架的范围综述。
Perspect Public Health. 2024 Jun 10:17579139241257102. doi: 10.1177/17579139241257102.
2
Mpox knowledge, behaviours and barriers to public health measures among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in the UK: a qualitative study to inform public health guidance and messaging.在英国,男同性恋者、双性恋者和其他与男性发生性关系的男性中,关于猴痘的知识、行为以及公共卫生措施的障碍:一项旨在为公共卫生指导和信息传递提供信息的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 17;23(1):2265. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17196-0.
3
高危人群肝脏疾病早期检测多模式试点服务的定性服务评估:“Alright My Liver?”
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 12;11(1):e001560. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001560.
4
Developing films to support vaccine-hesitant, ethnically diverse parents' decision-making about the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: a codesign study.制定影片以支持对 HPV 疫苗犹豫不决、种族多样化的父母做出决策:一项共同设计研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 12;14(9):e079539. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079539.
5
Engagement in rapid public health research among young people from underserved communities: maximising opportunities and overcoming barriers.促进服务不足社区的年轻人参与快速公共卫生研究:最大限度地利用机会和克服障碍。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):2217. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19762-6.
6
Reflections on co-producing an obesity-prevention toolkit for Islamic Religious Settings: a qualitative process evaluation.关于共同制作伊斯兰宗教场所肥胖预防工具包的思考:一项定性过程评估
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Jun 12;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01610-w.
7
"We all see things through a different lens based on our life experiences": co-production of a web-based implementation toolkit with stakeholders across the health and social care system.“基于我们的生活经历,我们都通过不同的视角看待事物”:与卫生和社会护理系统中的利益相关者共同制作一个基于网络的实施工具包。
Front Health Serv. 2024 May 15;4:1356961. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1356961. eCollection 2024.
8
Towards successful implementation of public health research into practice: Experiences and lessons learned from EDUCATE.迈向公共卫生研究成功转化为实践:从EDUCATE项目中获得的经验与教训
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2023 Oct 27;6:100447. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100447. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Mpox knowledge, behaviours and barriers to public health measures among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in the UK: a qualitative study to inform public health guidance and messaging.在英国,男同性恋者、双性恋者和其他与男性发生性关系的男性中,关于猴痘的知识、行为以及公共卫生措施的障碍:一项旨在为公共卫生指导和信息传递提供信息的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 17;23(1):2265. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17196-0.
10
Understanding adherence to self-isolation in the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study.理解英格兰 COVID-19 大流行第一阶段的自我隔离遵守情况:一项横断面混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 23;23(1):2074. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16674-9.
Applying concepts from "rapid" and "agile" implementation to advance implementation research.
应用“快速”和“敏捷”实施的概念来推进实施研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Nov 5;3(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00366-3.
4
Leaving No One Behind: Interventions and Outcomes of the COVID-19 Vaccine Maximising Uptake Programme.不让任何人掉队:新冠疫苗最大程度提高接种率计划的干预措施与成果
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 May 25;10(6):840. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10060840.
5
Perceived importance of pandemic interventions for attending cultural events - findings from Germany.人们对参加文化活动的大流行病干预措施的重视程度——来自德国的研究结果。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 10;22(1):925. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13358-8.
6
Impact of residual risk messaging to reduce false reassurance following test-negative results from asymptomatic coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) testing: an online experimental study of a hypothetical test.无症状冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)检测阴性结果后,通过残余风险信息传递减少错误保证的影响:对一项假设性检测的在线实验研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 16;12(3):e056533. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056533.
7
Co-creating a Theory of Change to advance COVID-19 testing and vaccine uptake in underserved communities.共同创建一个变革理论,以促进服务不足社区的 COVID-19 检测和疫苗接种。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):149-157. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13910. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
8
Association between two mass-gathering outdoor events and incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections during the fifth wave of COVID-19 in north-east Spain: A population-based control-matched analysis.西班牙东北部新冠疫情第五波期间两场大型户外聚集活动与新冠病毒感染发生率之间的关联:一项基于人群的对照匹配分析。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Feb 28;15:100337. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100337. eCollection 2022 Apr.
9
Using behavioural science in public health settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: The experience of public health practitioners and behavioural scientists.在 COVID-19 大流行期间将行为科学应用于公共卫生环境:公共卫生从业者和行为科学家的经验。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Apr;224:103527. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103527. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
10
What would it take to meaningfully attend to ethnicity and race in health research? Learning from a trial intervention development study.在健康研究中如何有意义地关注种族和民族问题?从一项试验性干预措施开发研究中学习。
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Dec;44 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):57-72. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13431. Epub 2022 Jan 12.