Department of Health Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Regent University, Virginia Beach, VA, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Apr;38(3):529-556. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2023.2233738. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
Feedback on neuropsychological assessment is a critical part of clinical practice, but there are few empirical papers on neuropsychological feedback practices. We sought to fill this gap in the literature by surveying practicing neuropsychologists in the United States. Questions addressed how they provide verbal and written feedback to patients and referral sources. Survey questions also addressed billing practices and training in the provision of feedback.
A survey was developed using Qualtrics XM to survey currently licensed, independently practicing clinical neuropsychologists in the United States about their feedback practices. The survey was completed by 184 individuals.
Nearly all respondents reported that they provide verbal feedback to patients, most often in-person, within three weeks following testing. Typically, verbal feedback sessions with patients last 45 min. Verbal feedback was provided to referrals by about half of our sample, typically a brief phone call. Most participants also reported providing written feedback to both the patient and referring provider, most commonly the written report within three weeks after testing. Regarding billing, most respondents use neuropsychological testing evaluation codes. The COVID-19 pandemic appeared to have had a limited impact on the perceived effectiveness and quality of verbal feedback sessions. Finally, respondents reported that across major stages of professional development, training in the provision of feedback gradually increased but was considered inadequate by many participants.
Results provide an empirical summary of the "state of current practice" for providing neuropsychological assessment feedback. Further experimental research is needed to develop an evidence-base for effective feedback practices.
神经心理学评估的反馈是临床实践的关键部分,但关于神经心理学反馈实践的经验性论文却很少。我们试图通过调查美国的执业神经心理学家来填补这一文献空白。问题涉及他们如何向患者和转介来源提供口头和书面反馈。调查问题还涉及提供反馈的计费实践和培训。
使用 Qualtrics XM 开发了一项调查,以调查美国目前持牌、独立执业的临床神经心理学家关于他们的反馈实践。有 184 人完成了这项调查。
几乎所有的受访者都报告说他们向患者提供口头反馈,最常见的是在测试后三周内进行面对面的反馈。通常,与患者的口头反馈会议持续 45 分钟。大约一半的受访者向转介人提供口头反馈,通常是简短的电话。大多数参与者还报告向患者和转介提供者提供书面反馈,最常见的是在测试后三周内提供书面报告。关于计费,大多数受访者使用神经心理测试评估代码。COVID-19 大流行似乎对口头反馈会议的有效性和质量的感知影响有限。最后,受访者报告说,在专业发展的各个主要阶段,提供反馈的培训逐渐增加,但许多参与者认为培训不足。
结果提供了提供神经心理学评估反馈的“当前实践状况”的经验总结。需要进一步的实验研究来为有效的反馈实践建立证据基础。