First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Dragana, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelismos General Hospital, 45-47 Ipsilantou Street, 10676 Athens, Greece.
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 21;24(13):10458. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310458.
Long COVID (LC) encompasses a constellation of long-term symptoms experienced by at least 10% of people after the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection, and so far it has affected about 65 million people. The etiology of LC remains unclear; however, many pathophysiological pathways may be involved, including viral persistence; a chronic, low-grade inflammatory response; immune dysregulation and a defective immune response; the reactivation of latent viruses; autoimmunity; persistent endothelial dysfunction and coagulopathy; gut dysbiosis; hormonal and metabolic dysregulation; mitochondrial dysfunction; and autonomic nervous system dysfunction. There are no specific tests for the diagnosis of LC, and clinical features including laboratory findings and biomarkers may not specifically relate to LC. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to develop and validate biomarkers that can be employed for the prediction, diagnosis and prognosis of LC and its therapeutic response, although this effort may be hampered by challenges pertaining to the non-specific nature of the majority of clinical manifestations in the LC spectrum, small sample sizes of relevant studies and other methodological issues. Promising candidate biomarkers that are found in some patients are markers of systemic inflammation, including acute phase proteins, cytokines and chemokines; biomarkers reflecting SARS-CoV-2 persistence, the reactivation of herpesviruses and immune dysregulation; biomarkers of endotheliopathy, coagulation and fibrinolysis; microbiota alterations; diverse proteins and metabolites; hormonal and metabolic biomarkers; and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. At present, there are only two reviews summarizing relevant biomarkers; however, they do not cover the entire umbrella of current biomarkers, their link to etiopathogenetic mechanisms or the diagnostic work-up in a comprehensive manner. Herein, we aim to appraise and synopsize the available evidence on the typical laboratory manifestations and candidate biomarkers of LC, their classification based on pathogenetic mechanisms and the main LC symptomatology in the frame of the epidemiological and clinical aspects of the syndrome and furthermore assess limitations and challenges as well as potential implications in candidate therapeutic interventions.
长新冠(LC)是指在初次感染 SARS-CoV-2 后,至少有 10%的人会出现长期症状的一种病症,迄今为止,它已经影响了约 6500 万人。LC 的病因尚不清楚;然而,许多病理生理途径可能涉及,包括病毒持续存在、慢性低度炎症反应、免疫失调和免疫反应缺陷、潜伏病毒的再激活、自身免疫、持续的内皮功能障碍和凝血功能障碍、肠道菌群失调、激素和代谢失调、线粒体功能障碍和自主神经功能障碍。目前还没有专门用于 LC 诊断的测试,包括实验室检查结果和生物标志物在内的临床特征可能与 LC 没有特定关系。因此,开发和验证能够用于预测、诊断和预后 LC 及其治疗反应的生物标志物至关重要,尽管这一努力可能会受到与 LC 谱中大多数临床表现的非特异性性质、相关研究样本量小以及其他方法学问题等挑战的阻碍。在一些患者中发现的一些有前途的候选生物标志物是全身炎症的标志物,包括急性期蛋白、细胞因子和趋化因子;反映 SARS-CoV-2 持续存在、疱疹病毒再激活和免疫失调的标志物;内皮病变、凝血和纤维蛋白溶解的标志物;微生物群改变;各种蛋白质和代谢物;激素和代谢生物标志物;以及脑脊液生物标志物。目前,只有两篇综述总结了相关的生物标志物;然而,它们没有全面涵盖当前生物标志物的整个范围、它们与发病机制的联系,或全面的诊断检查。在此,我们旨在评估和总结 LC 的典型实验室表现和候选生物标志物的现有证据,根据发病机制对它们进行分类,并根据该综合征的流行病学和临床方面对主要的 LC 症状进行分类,此外还评估了局限性和挑战以及候选治疗干预的潜在影响。