Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Laboratory for Digital Signal Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.
Exp Brain Res. 2023 Aug;241(8):2069-2079. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06648-z. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
Despite commonly investigated predictable smooth-pursuit neck-torsion tasks (SPNT) in neck pain patients, unpredictable conditions have been seldom investigated but are indicative of preserved oculomotor functions during neck torsion. Although not previously studied, some speculations about compensatory cognitive mechanisms such as increased phasic alertness during unpredictable tasks were suggested. The aim of this study was to investigate eye movement accuracy and pupillometric responses during predictable and unpredictable SPNT test in neck pain patients and asymptomatic controls. Eye movements (gain and SPNT-difference) and pupillometry indicative of tonic (average and relative pupil diameter) and phasic (index of cognitive activity-ICA) alertness were measured in 28 idiopathic neck pain patients and 30 asymptomatic individuals using infrared video-oculography during predictable and unpredictable SPNT test. Gain in unpredictable SPNT test was lower as compared to predictable tasks and presented with similar levels in neutral and neck torsion positions, but not in the predictable SPNT test. ICA was lower during neutral position in all tasks in patients as compared to control group but increased during neck torsion positions in unpredictable tasks. Relative pupil diameters presented with no differences between the groups or neck positions, but the opposite was observed for average pupil diameter. Higher ICA indicates an increase in phasic alertness in neck pain patients despite no alterations in oculomotor control during SPNT test. This is the first study to indicate cognitive deficits in oculomotor task in neck pain patients. The latter could negatively affect other tasks where additional cognitive resources must be involved.
尽管在颈部疼痛患者中经常研究可预测的平滑追踪颈部扭转任务(SPNT),但不可预测的情况很少被研究,但可表明颈部扭转期间眼动功能保持完好。尽管尚未进行过研究,但有人推测在不可预测的任务中存在补偿性认知机制,例如相位警觉性增加。本研究旨在研究颈部疼痛患者和无症状对照者在可预测和不可预测的 SPNT 测试中的眼动准确性和瞳孔测量反应。使用红外视频眼动图,在可预测和不可预测的 SPNT 测试中测量了 28 名特发性颈部疼痛患者和 30 名无症状个体的眼动(增益和 SPNT 差异)和瞳孔测量(提示紧张性的平均瞳孔直径和相对瞳孔直径以及提示相位警觉性的认知活动指数-ICA)。与可预测任务相比,不可预测的 SPNT 测试中的增益较低,并且在中立和颈部扭转位置均具有相似的水平,但在可预测的 SPNT 测试中则没有。与对照组相比,患者在所有任务的中立位置的 ICA 均较低,但在不可预测的任务中颈部扭转位置的 ICA 增加。在所有任务中,患者的相对瞳孔直径在组间或颈部位置上均无差异,但平均瞳孔直径则相反。尽管在 SPNT 测试中眼动控制没有改变,但 ICA 较高表明颈部疼痛患者的相位警觉性增加。这是第一项表明颈部疼痛患者在眼动任务中存在认知缺陷的研究。后者可能会对需要额外认知资源的其他任务产生负面影响。