Lemme Nicholas J, Yang Daniel S, Talley-Bruns Rachel, Alsoof Daniel, Daniels Alan H, Petit Logan, Fadale Paul D
Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jul 12;11(7):23259671231181371. doi: 10.1177/23259671231181371. eCollection 2023 Jul.
To date, there is a scarcity of literature related to the incidence of prolonged stiffness after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear that requires manipulation under anesthesia/lysis of adhesions (MUA/LOA) in the preoperative period before ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and how preoperative stiffness influences outcomes after ACLR.
Preoperative stiffness requiring MUA/LOA would increase the risk for postoperative stiffness, postoperative complications, and the need for subsequent procedures after ACLR.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
The PearlDiver Research Program was used to identify patients who sustained an ACL tear and underwent ACLR using their respective International Classification of Diseases, 9th or 10th Revision, and Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes. Within this group, patients with preoperative stiffness were identified using the CPT codes for MUA or LOA. Significant risk factors for preoperative stiffness were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Outcomes after ACLR were analyzed between patients with and without preoperative stiffness using multivariate logistic regression, controlling for age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index.
Between 2008 and 2018, 187,071 patients who underwent ACLR were identified. Of these patients, 241 (0.13%) underwent MUA/LOA before ACLR. Patients with preoperative stiffness began preoperative physical therapy significantly later than patients without stiffness ( = .0478) and had a delay in time to ACLR ( = .0003). Univariate logistic regression demonstrated that female sex, older age, anxiety/depression, obesity, and anticoagulation use were significant risk factors for preoperative stiffness ( < .05 for all). After multivariate regression, anticoagulation use was the only independent risk factor deemed significant (odds ratio, 6.69 [95% CI, 4.01-10.51]; < .001). Patients with preoperative stiffness were at an increased risk of experiencing postoperative stiffness, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, surgical-site infection, and septic knee arthritis after ACLR ( < .05 for all).
Although the risk of preoperative stiffness requiring an MUA/LOA before ACLR is low, the study findings indicated that patients with preoperative stiffness were at increased risk for postoperative complications compared with patients with no stiffness before ACLR.
迄今为止,关于前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂后在ACL重建(ACLR)术前需要麻醉下手法松解/粘连松解术(MUA/LOA)的长期僵硬发生率,以及术前僵硬如何影响ACLR术后结果的文献较少。
术前需要MUA/LOA的僵硬会增加ACLR术后僵硬、术后并发症以及后续手术需求的风险。
队列研究;证据等级,3级。
使用PearlDiver研究项目,通过各自的国际疾病分类第9版或第10版以及当前手术操作术语(CPT)编码来识别ACL撕裂并接受ACLR的患者。在该组中,使用MUA或LOA的CPT编码识别术前僵硬的患者。通过单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析确定术前僵硬的显著危险因素。使用多因素逻辑回归分析ACLR术后有和没有术前僵硬的患者的结果,同时控制年龄、性别和埃利克斯豪泽合并症指数。
在2008年至2018年期间,共识别出187,071例接受ACLR的患者。其中,241例(0.13%)在ACLR术前接受了MUA/LOA。术前僵硬的患者开始术前物理治疗的时间明显晚于无僵硬的患者(P = 0.0478),且ACLR的时间延迟(P = 0.0003)。单因素逻辑回归表明,女性、年龄较大、焦虑/抑郁、肥胖和使用抗凝剂是术前僵硬的显著危险因素(所有P < 0.05)。多因素回归后,使用抗凝剂是唯一被认为显著的独立危险因素(比值比,6.69 [95% CI,4.01 - 10.51];P < 0.001)。术前僵硬的患者在ACLR术后发生术后僵硬、深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞、手术部位感染和化脓性膝关节炎的风险增加(所有P < 0.05)。
虽然ACLR术前需要MUA/LOA的僵硬风险较低,但研究结果表明,与ACLR术前无僵硬的患者相比,术前僵硬的患者术后并发症风险增加。