Guo Lingfeng, Fang Shixin, Wen Hongbo
Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1211282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211282. eCollection 2023.
Unidimensional bipolar scales based on prejudice against homosexuality neglect the effect of preference for heterosexuality on attitudes toward homosexuality. Additionally, the term "homosexuality" used in these scales may compromise their validity. The current study uses person-centered and variable-centered approaches to examine the structure and classes of attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. In Study 1, we developed the Two-factor Attitudes toward Lesbians and Gay Men Scales, which have acceptable reliability and validity. The results obtained through variable-centered approaches suggested that a model comprising two factors (prejudice against homosexuality and preference for heterosexuality) was ideal. In Study 2, we explored the classes of attitudes toward lesbians and gay men through latent class analysis. The results supported a model containing three classes (purely positive, discriminatorily positive, and negative). This study validates a two-factor structure of attitudes toward lesbians and gay men and distinguishes between purely positive and discriminatorily positive attitudes, providing an important reference for future research and interventions to promote public attitudes toward lesbians and gay men.
基于对同性恋偏见的单维双极量表忽视了对异性恋的偏好对同性恋态度的影响。此外,这些量表中使用的“同性恋”一词可能会损害其有效性。当前研究采用以人为主和以变量为主的方法来检验对女同性恋者和男同性恋者态度的结构和类别。在研究1中,我们编制了《对女同性恋者和男同性恋者的双因素态度量表》,该量表具有可接受的信度和效度。通过以变量为主的方法获得的结果表明,一个包含两个因素(对同性恋的偏见和对异性恋的偏好)的模型是理想的。在研究2中,我们通过潜在类别分析探索了对女同性恋者和男同性恋者的态度类别。结果支持一个包含三个类别的模型(纯粹积极、有区别的积极和消极)。本研究验证了对女同性恋者和男同性恋者态度的双因素结构,并区分了纯粹积极和有区别的积极态度,为未来促进公众对女同性恋者和男同性恋者态度的研究和干预提供了重要参考。